Abstract:This paper explores the application of the Condorcet Jury theorem to the domain of sentiment analysis, specifically examining the performance of various large language models (LLMs) compared to simpler natural language processing (NLP) models. The theorem posits that a majority vote classifier should enhance predictive accuracy, provided that individual classifiers' decisions are independent. Our empirical study tests this theoretical framework by implementing a majority vote mechanism across different models, including advanced LLMs such as ChatGPT 4. Contrary to expectations, the results reveal only marginal improvements in performance when incorporating larger models, suggesting a lack of independence among them. This finding aligns with the hypothesis that despite their complexity, LLMs do not significantly outperform simpler models in reasoning tasks within sentiment analysis, showing the practical limits of model independence in the context of advanced NLP tasks.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper explores the application of the Condorcet Jury Theorem in the field of sentiment analysis, especially studying the performance of various large language models (LLMs) compared to simpler natural language processing (NLP) models. The Condorcet Jury Theorem states that if the decisions of individual classifiers are independent, then the majority - vote classifier should be able to improve prediction accuracy. This paper tests this theoretical framework by implementing a majority - vote mechanism among different models, including advanced LLMs such as ChatGPT 4. **Main problems**: - **Model independence**: Research on the independence of large language models (LLMs) in sentiment analysis tasks. Specifically, the paper attempts to verify whether these models can operate independently and whether their analyses are reliable and unique in complex sentiment tasks. - **Performance improvement**: Explore whether the performance of sentiment analysis can be significantly improved when using larger and more complex models. The results show that although LLMs perform well in complex reasoning tasks, their performance improvement in sentiment analysis tasks is not obvious, indicating a lack of independence among these models. ### Research background - **Natural language processing in the financial field**: The application of NLP in the financial field has become crucial, especially in extracting market sentiment and providing predictive insights. However, financial narratives usually involve complex domain - specific terms and contain multiple emotions related to different entities, which makes general - purpose sentiment analysis tools less effective. - **Model development**: From simple machine - learning techniques to more complex NLP models (such as BERT and FinBERT), and then to large language models (such as GPT and its variants), the development of models has brought new opportunities and challenges. ### Main contributions 1. **Theoretical contributions**: Extend the Condorcet Jury Theorem to make it applicable to multi - class classification problems. Introduce the concept of the IWTUB (Independent, Well - Trained, and Uniformly Biased towards the Correct Option) set. 2. **Empirical verification**: Through majority - vote experiments with multiple NLP models (including fine - tuned FinBERT, DistilRoBERTa, GPT - 3.5, and GPT - 4), it is found that there is no significant performance improvement, indicating a lack of independence among the models. 3. **Insights into LLMs**: The research results show that there is a significant overlap in the decision - making processes of both compact and advanced models in financial sentiment analysis, and generative LLMs may lack independence in reasoning tasks. ### Experimental framework - **Dataset**: Use a high - quality dataset containing Bloomberg news headlines from 2010 to 2024 (called market summaries), reviewed by financial professionals. The dataset contains approximately 65,000 records, and each record is accompanied by the return rate of the major stock market the next day, thus providing a systematic method to evaluate the predictive ability of news sentiment on future market impact. - **Models**: The models used in the experiment include FinBERT, DistilRoBERTa, and GPT - 4, which are fine - tuned and evaluated for performance in financial classification tasks. ### Conclusion The paper proves through experiments that although large language models perform excellently in some complex tasks, their performance improvement in sentiment analysis tasks is not significant, indicating a lack of independence in the decision - making processes among these models. This finding is of great significance for practical applications in the financial field, especially in cases where decisions rely on models.

Examining Independence in Ensemble Sentiment Analysis: A Study on the Limits of Large Language Models Using the Condorcet Jury Theorem

Dynamic Sentiment Analysis with Local Large Language Models using Majority Voting: A Study on Factors Affecting Restaurant Evaluation

Language Model Council: Democratically Benchmarking Foundation Models on Highly Subjective Tasks

Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models

Fractal-Inspired Sentiment Analysis: Evaluation Of Large Language Models And Deep Learning Methods

Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debate

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment Prediction

Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check

Do Large Language Models Exhibit Cognitive Dissonance? Studying the Difference Between Revealed Beliefs and Stated Answers

Probabilistic Consensus through Ensemble Validation: A Framework for LLM Reliability

Quantifying the Impact of Large Language Models on Collective Opinion Dynamics

Do Large Language Models Possess Sensitive to Sentiment?

Movie Review Sentiment Analysis: Supervised Learning versus Large Language Model

An Empirical Analysis on Large Language Models in Debate Evaluation

Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Models

From Calculation to Adjudication: Examining LLM judges on Mathematical Reasoning Tasks

LLM Voting: Human Choices and AI Collective Decision Making

Are Social Sentiments Inherent in LLMs? An Empirical Study on Extraction of Inter-demographic Sentiments

Revisiting Sentiment Analysis for Software Engineering in the Era of Large Language Models

The Model Arena for Cross-lingual Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study in the Era of Large Language Models

Analyzing Large Language Models for Classroom Discussion Assessment