Separating Super-Puffs vs. Hot Jupiters Among Young Puffy Planets

Amalia Karalis,Eve J. Lee,Daniel P. Thorngren
2024-08-29
Abstract:Discoveries of close-in young puffy (R$_p \gtrsim$ 6 R$_\oplus$) planets raise the question of whether they are bona fide hot Jupiters or puffed-up Neptunes, potentially placing constraints on the formation location and timescale of hot Jupiters. Obtaining mass measurements for these planets is challenging due to stellar activity and noisy spectra. Therefore, we aim to provide independent theoretical constraints on the masses of these young planets based on their radii, incident fluxes, and ages, benchmarking to the planets of age $<$1 Gyr detected by Kepler, K2 and TESS. Through a combination of interior structure models, considerations of photoevaporative mass loss, and empirical mass-metallicity trends, we present the range of possible masses for 24 planets of age $\sim$10-900 Myr and radii $\sim$6-16 R$_\oplus$. We generally find that our mass estimates are in agreement with the measured masses and upper limits where applicable. There exist some outliers including super-puffs Kepler-51 b, c and V1298 Tau d, b, e, for which we outline their likely formation conditions. Our analyses demonstrate that most of the youngest planets ($\lesssim$ 100 Myr) tend to be puffed-up, Neptune-mass planets, while the true hot Jupiters are typically found around stars aged at least a few hundred Myr, suggesting the dominant origin of hot Jupiters to be late-stage high eccentricity migration.
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve The paper attempts to address whether young, inflated planets (with radii greater than 6 Earth radii) are truly hot Jupiters or inflated Neptune-like planets. Specifically, the authors aim to provide independent theoretical mass constraints through the radii, received radiation flux, and ages of these planets to distinguish between super-puffs and hot Jupiters. This study helps to understand the formation location and timescale of hot Jupiters. ### Background Hot Jupiters were among the first exoplanets discovered, but their origins remain unclear. Currently, there are three main hypotheses: in-situ formation, disk-induced migration, and high-eccentricity migration. Each hypothesis has its pros and cons, but ruling out any hypothesis through observational data remains challenging. For example, the non-zero inclination of hot Jupiters might be a sign of high-eccentricity migration but could also result from warped disk migration. ### Research Methods 1. **Target Selection**: - Selected young planets (age less than 1 billion years), with radii greater than 6 Earth radii and received radiation flux higher than 3.17×10^6 erg/s/cm². - Data sources include TESS, Kepler, and K2 missions. 2. **Internal Structure Model**: - Used thermal evolution models to constrain the mass of the planets, considering their radii, received radiation flux, and age. - The model solved the structure equations (hydrostatic equilibrium, mass conservation, and energy conservation) to determine the radius-mass relationship for given metallic mass, gas-to-metal mass ratio, received radiation flux, and age. 3. **Mass Loss**: - Considered photoevaporation mass loss to set the lower limit of low-mass solutions. - Used mass-radius relationship curves of brown dwarfs of different ages to exclude high-mass solutions. ### Main Findings - **Mass Estimates**: - Most young planets (age less than 100 million years) tend to be inflated Neptune-like planets, while true hot Jupiters usually appear around stars at least a few hundred million years old. - This result supports the hypothesis that hot Jupiters primarily form through late-stage high-eccentricity migration. - **Outlier Analysis**: - Includes planets like Kepler-51 b, c, and V1298 Tau d, b, e, whose formation conditions differ from other planets and may require special explanations. ### Conclusion By combining internal structure models, photoevaporation mass loss, and known trends in planetary and stellar metallicity, the authors successfully provided mass estimates for 24 young planets. These results indicate that most young, inflated planets are Neptune-like, while the formation of hot Jupiters mainly occurs at later stages of stellar age, supporting the high-eccentricity migration theory.