A novel method to separate circadian from non-circadian masking effects in order to enhance daily circadian timing and amplitude estimation from core body temperature

Phuc D Nguyen,Claire Dunbar,Hannah Scott,Bastien Lechat,Jack Manners,Gorica Micic,Nicole Lovato,Amy C Reynolds,Leon Lack,Robert Adams,Danny Eckert,Andrew Vakulin,Peter G Catcheside
2024-08-27
Abstract:Circadian disruption contributes to adverse effects on sleep, performance, and health. One accepted method to track continuous daily changes in circadian timing is to measure core body temperature (CBT), and establish daily, circadian-related CBT minimum time (Tmin). This method typically applies cosine-model fits to measured CBT data, which may not adequately account for substantial wake metabolic activity and sleep effects on CBT that confound and mask circadian effects, and thus estimates of the circadian-related Tmin. This study introduced a novel physiology-grounded analytic approach to separate circadian from non-circadian effects on CBT, which we compared against traditional cosine-based methods. The dataset comprised 33 healthy participants attending a 39-hour in-laboratory study with an initial overnight sleep followed by an extended wake period. CBT data were collected at 30-second intervals via ingestible capsules. Our design captured CBT during both the baseline sleep period and during extended wake period (without sleep) and allowed us to model the influence of circadian and non-circadian effects of sleep, wake, and activity on CBT using physiology-guided generalized additive models. Model fits and estimated Tmin inferred from extended wake without sleep were compared with traditional cosine-based models fits. Compared to the traditional cosine model, the new model exhibited superior fits to CBT (Pearson R 0.90 [95%CI; [0.83 - 0.96] versus 0.81 [0.55-0.93]). The difference between estimated vs measured circadian Tmin, derived from the day without sleep, was better fit with our method (0.2 [-0.5,0.3] hours) versus previous methods (1.4 [1.1 to 1.7] hours). This new method provides superior demasking of non-circadian influences compared to traditional cosine methods, including the removal of a sleep-related bias towards an earlier estimate of circadian Tmin.
Quantitative Methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to address the issue of how to separate circadian and non-circadian effects from core body temperature (CBT) data to improve the accuracy of daily circadian rhythm time and amplitude estimates. Specifically, traditional methods often use cosine fitting to analyze CBT data, but this approach may not adequately account for the effects of metabolic activity and sleep on CBT, leading to biases in the estimation of circadian-related minimum values (Tmin). Therefore, this paper proposes a new physiology-based analytical method to separate circadian and non-circadian effects in CBT and compares it with the traditional cosine fitting method. Through this method, researchers hope to more accurately estimate the impact of circadian rhythms and reduce errors caused by sleep-related shifts. This is particularly important in practical applications, such as the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders, where real-time and reliable circadian rhythm estimates are needed.