Abstract:This paper presents a performance comparison of various MIMO radar multiplexing approaches where the increasing number of transmitters adversely affects the dynamic range of the resultant MIMO system. The investigated multiplexing techniques are code-division multiplexing in phase-coded frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) and phase-modulated continuous wave (PMCW) radar. Additionally, random fast/slow time multiplexing in time and frequency is considered for frequency-modulated continuous wave and orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) radars. The comparative analysis is conducted through simulations, evaluating the scalability with the number of transmitters and addressing other pertinent implementation concerns. The findings provide insights into the trade-offs associated with each approach, aiding in selecting suitable MIMO radar multiplexing strategies for practical applications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: With the increase in the number of transmitters in MIMO radar systems, how to avoid a significant decrease in dynamic range while maintaining maximum unambiguous parameter estimation (such as velocity and range). Specifically, the paper compares the performance of several MIMO radar multiplexing methods, including code - division multiplexing (CDM) - based methods (such as phase - modulated continuous - wave radar PMCW and phase - coded frequency - modulated continuous - wave radar PC - FMCW) and non - uniform time - frequency multiplexing - based methods (such as random fast/slow - time multiplexing), to evaluate the performance of these methods when extended to a large number of transmitters, and discusses related implementation issues.
### Main problems
1. **The impact of the increase in the number of transmitters on the dynamic range**:
- As the number of transmitters increases, traditional time - division multiplexing (TDM) and Doppler - division multiplexing (DDM) methods will lead to a significant reduction in the maximum unambiguous velocity estimation.
- Code multiplexing (such as CDM) and other random time - frequency multiplexing methods can alleviate this problem to a certain extent, but will introduce dynamic range loss.
2. **Trade - offs of different multiplexing techniques**:
- Code - division multiplexing (CDM) is achieved by discretely phase - shifting and modulating radar signals, and is suitable for PMCW and PC - FMCW radars. Although low cross - correlation can minimize self - interference, as the number of transmitters increases, the dynamic range loss will also increase.
- Non - uniform time - frequency multiplexing (such as random TDM, FDM, and TFDM) can avoid the reduction in maximum unambiguous parameter estimation, but will introduce dynamic range loss in range or Doppler estimation.
3. **Practical considerations in system design**:
- Different multiplexing methods will have different priorities in practical applications. For example, near - high - power targets may mask far - low - power targets (especially in the range domain), or the increase in sidelobes in the Doppler domain will affect the discrimination of equidistant targets.
### Solutions
The paper compares the performance of multiple MIMO radar waveforms through simulation, especially their dynamic range changes when extended to multiple transmitters. The following methods are mainly studied:
- **PMCW radar**: Use phase codes with good autocorrelation characteristics for modulation and achieve MIMO through code - division multiplexing.
- **PC - FMCW radar**: Add internal - pulse phase modulation on the basis of the commonly used FMCW waveform to achieve simultaneous MIMO.
- **OFDM radar**: Utilize orthogonal frequency - division multiplexing technology to achieve multi - transmitter multiplexing by allocating specific sub - carriers and symbols.
- **Random TDM - FMCW radar**: Achieve non - uniform slow - time sampling through pseudo - random sequences to avoid the reduction in maximum unambiguous Doppler estimation.
Through the comparison of these methods, the paper provides insights into the advantages and disadvantages of each method, helping to select a suitable MIMO radar multiplexing strategy for practical applications.
### Conclusions
The research results of the paper show that different MIMO radar multiplexing methods have different performances in dynamic range, specifically depending on the number of transmitters and the multiplexing method. These results provide guidance for MIMO system design for specific application scenarios, especially when it is necessary to balance maximum unambiguous parameter estimation and dynamic range.