Abstract:Station keeping is an essential maneuver for autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs), mainly when used in confined spaces, to carry out surveys that require the ASV to keep its position or in collaboration with other vehicles where the relative position has an impact over the mission. However, this maneuver can become challenging for classic feedback controllers due to the need for an accurate model of the ASV dynamics and the environmental disturbances. This work proposes a model predictive controller using neural network simulation error minimization (NNSEM–MPC) to accurately predict the dynamics of the ASV under wind disturbances. The performance of the proposed scheme under wind disturbances is tested and compared against other controllers in simulation, using the robotics operating system and the multipurpose simulation environment Gazebo. A set of six tests was conducted by combining two varying wind speeds that are modeled as the Harris spectrum and three wind directions (0 ° , 90 ° , and 180 ° ). The simulation results clearly show the advantage of the NNSEM–MPC over the following methods: backstepping controller, sliding mode controller, simplified dynamics MPC (SD‐MPC), neural ordinary differential equation MPC (NODE‐MPC), and knowledge‐based NODE MPC. The proposed NNSEM–MPC approach performs better than the rest in five out of the six test conditions, and it is the second best in the remaining test case, reducing the mean position and heading error by at least 27.08 % (0.38 m) and 41.02 % (0.9 3 ° ), respectively, across all the test cases. In terms of execution speed, the proposed NNSEM–MPC is at least 36% faster than the rest of the MPC controllers. The field experiments on two different ASV platforms showed that ASVs can effectively keep the station utilizing the proposed method, with a position error as low as 1.68 m and a heading error as low as 6.1 4 ° within time windows of at least 150 s. This would increase the potential applications of ASVs for launch, recovery, and replenishment in long‐term surveys in collaboration with other autonomous systems.

Autonomous Station Keeping of Satellites in Areostationary Mars Orbit: A Predictive Control Approach

The Stable Orbit of the Small Satellite Flying-Around the Space Station and the Orbit Maintenance

Satellite Attitude Tracking Control of Moving Targets Combining Deep Reinforcement Learning and Predefined-time Stability Considering Energy Optimization

Electric Satellite Station Keeping, Attitude Control, and Momentum Management by MPC

Linearized model for satellite station-keeping and tandem formations under the effects of atmospheric drag

Contingency-Aware Station-Keeping Control of Halo Orbits

Autonomous navigation for Mars probes using only satellite-to-satellite tracking measurements by singularity-avoiding orbit elements

Statistical Analysis of Optimal Stationkeeping Location and Coast Duration Using Stretching Directions

Active Disturbance Rejection Station-Keeping Control of Unstable Orbits Around Collinear Libration Points

Autonomous and Robust Orbit-keeping for Small Body Missions

Autonomous optical navigation using nanosatellite-class instruments: a Mars approach case study

Nonlinear and Machine-Learning-Based Station-Keeping Control of an Unmanned Surface Vehicle

ASV station keeping under wind disturbances using neural network simulation error minimization model predictive control

Model Predictive Control in Spacecraft Rendezvous and Soft Docking

An Autonomous Planetary Navigation System Independent of GNSS and Ground Station Tracking

Active disturbance rejection station-keeping control of cislunar point orbits

Autonomous Approach and Fly Around a Target Satellite with Input Constraints

Passivity-Based Distributed Acquisition and Station-Keeping Control of a Satellite Constellation in Areostationary Orbit

Exploration and Maintenance of Homeomorphic Orbit Revs in the Elliptic Restricted Three-Body Problem

Spacecraft Relative Motion Control Near an Asteroid With Uncertainties: A Lyapunov Redesign Approach

Autonomous Orbital Correction for Nano Satellites Using J2 Perturbation and LSTM Networks