Abstract:Mathematical analysis of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) led to the development of a mathematical function, usually called the inconsistency index, which has the center role in measuring the inconsistency of the judgements in AHP. Inconsistency index is a mathematical function which maps every pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) into a real number. An inconsistency index can be considered more trustworthy when it satisfies a set of suitable properties. Therefore, the research community has been trying to postulate a set of desirable rules (axioms, properties) for inconsistency indices. Subsequently, many axiomatic frameworks for these functions have been suggested independently, however, the literature on the topic is fragmented and missing a broader framework. Therefore, the objective of this article is twofold. Firstly, we provide a comprehensive review of the advancements in the axiomatization of inconsistency indices' properties during the last decade. Secondly, we provide a comparison and discussion of the aforementioned axiomatic structures along with directions of the future research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the following aspects:
1. **Axiomatic Structure of Inconsistency Indices**:
- The paper aims to provide a comprehensive review, covering the development of the axiomatic structure of inconsistency index properties in the past decade. These inconsistency indices are used to measure the consistency problems of judgments in pairwise comparison methods (such as Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP).
- The authors attempt to provide directions for future research by comparing and discussing different axiomatic frameworks.
2. **Fragmentation Problem of Existing Literature**:
- Currently, the literature on inconsistency indices is relatively scattered and lacks a comprehensive framework. Therefore, one of the goals of this paper is to integrate these scattered research results to form a more systematic understanding.
3. **Establishment of a Unified Evaluation Framework**:
- The research community has been striving to propose a set of ideal rules (axioms, properties) to ensure the reliability and applicability of inconsistency indices. This paper attempts to promote the standardization and unification in this field by comparing different axiomatic structures.
4. **Directions for Future Research**:
- In addition to summarizing the existing research results, this paper also proposes directions for future research in order to further improve the theoretical basis and practical application of inconsistency indices.
### Specific Problem Description
- **Consistency Problem of Pairwise Comparison Matrix (PCM)**:
- In multi - criteria decision - making methods, pairwise comparison matrices are used to represent the relative preferences between different objects. However, these matrices may have consistency problems, that is, some comparison results may be contradictory. For this reason, researchers have proposed a variety of inconsistency indices to quantify this inconsistency.
- **Axiomatic Requirements of Inconsistency Indices**:
- To ensure the effectiveness of inconsistency indices, researchers have proposed several axioms (for example, Koczkodaj & Szwarc, Brunelli & Fedrizzi, etc.). These axioms stipulate the conditions that inconsistency indices should meet, such as consistency matrices should be mapped to zero, and inconsistency should change within a certain range.
- **Limitations of Existing Inconsistency Indices**:
- Although many inconsistency indices have been proposed, their performance in practical applications is not always satisfactory. For example, some indices may not have clear thresholds, or produce contradictory results in different situations. Therefore, this paper also explores how to improve these indices to make them more reliable and practical.
### Summary
In general, the main goal of this paper is to provide a more unified and comprehensive understanding in this field through systematically reviewing and comparing the existing axiomatic structures of inconsistency indices, and to point out directions for future research.