Abstract:With wide deployment of deep neural network (DNN) classifiers, there is great potential for harm from adversarial learning attacks. Recently, a special type of data poisoning (DP) attack, known as a backdoor (or Trojan), was proposed. These attacks do not seek to degrade classification accuracy, but rather to have the classifier learn to classify to a target class t∗ whenever the backdoor pattern is present in a test example originally from a source class s∗ . Launching backdoor attacks does not require knowledge of the classifier or its training process-only the ability to poison the training set with exemplars containing a backdoor pattern (labeled with the target class). Defenses against backdoors can be deployed before/during training, post-training, or at test time. Here, we address post-training detection in DNN image classifiers, seldom considered in existing works, wherein the defender does not have access to the poisoned training set, but only to the trained classifier itself, as well as to clean (unpoisoned) examples from the classification domain. This scenario is of great interest because e.g., a classifier may be the basis of a phone app that will be shared with many users. Detection may thus reveal a widespread attack. We propose a purely unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) defense against imperceptible backdoor attacks that: 1) detects whether the trained DNN has been backdoor-attacked; 2) infers the source and target classes in a detected attack; 3) estimates the backdoor pattern itself. Our AD approach involves learning (via suitable cost function minimization) the minimum size/norm perturbation (putative backdoor) required to induce the classifier to misclassify (most) examples from class s to class t , for all (s,t) pairs. Our hypothesis is that nonattacked pairs require large perturbations, while the attacked pair (s∗, t∗) requires much smaller ones. This is convincingly borne out experimentally. We identify a variety of plausible cost functions and devise a novel, robust hypothesis testing approach to perform detection inference. We test our approach, in comparison with the state-of-the-art methods, for several backdoor patterns, attack settings and mechanisms, and data sets and demonstrate its favorability. Our defense essentially requires setting a single hyperparameter (the detection threshold), which can e.g., be chosen to fix the system's false positive rate.

Protecting against simultaneous data poisoning attacks

Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoning

Beating Backdoor Attack at Its Own Game

Systematic Evaluation of Backdoor Data Poisoning Attacks on Image Classifiers

Backdoor Defense via Adaptively Splitting Poisoned Dataset

Circumventing Backdoor Defenses That Are Based on Latent Separability

DLP: towards active defense against backdoor attacks with decoupled learning process

Mitigating Backdoor Attack by Injecting Proactive Defensive Backdoor

Poison as a Cure: Detecting & Neutralizing Variable-Sized Backdoor Attacks in Deep Neural Networks

Universal Backdoor Attacks

Multidomain active defense: Detecting multidomain backdoor poisoned samples via ALL-to-ALL decoupling training without clean datasets

Reverse Engineering Imperceptible Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Detection and Training Set Cleansing

Strong Data Augmentation Sanitizes Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks Without an Accuracy Tradeoff

Efficient Backdoor Attacks for Deep Neural Networks in Real-world Scenarios

Dynamic Backdoor Attacks Against Machine Learning Models

Detection of Backdoors in Trained Classifiers Without Access to the Training Set

Silent Killer: A Stealthy, Clean-Label, Black-Box Backdoor Attack

Backdoors Stuck At The Frontdoor: Multi-Agent Backdoor Attacks That Backfire

Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Data

Progressive Poisoned Data Isolation for Training-time Backdoor Defense

Pick your Poison: Undetectability versus Robustness in Data Poisoning Attacks