Abstract:Logic locking is a hardware security technique to intellectual property (IP) against security threats in the IC supply chain, especially untrusted fabs. Such techniques incorporate additional locking circuitry within an IC that induces incorrect functionality when an incorrect key is provided. The amount of error induced is known as the effectiveness of the locking technique. "SAT attacks" provide a strong mathematical formulation to find the correct key of locked circuits. In order to achieve high SAT resilience(i.e. complexity of SAT attacks), many conventional logic locking schemes fail to inject sufficient error into the circuit. For example, in the case of SARLock and Anti-SAT, there are usually very few (or only one) input minterms that cause any error at the circuit output. The state-of-the-art stripped functionality logic locking (SFLL) technique introduced a trade-off between SAT resilience and effectiveness. In this work, we prove that such a trade-off is universal in logic locking. In order to attain high effectiveness of locking without compromising SAT resilience, we propose a novel logic locking scheme, called Strong Anti-SAT (SAS). In addition to SAT attacks, removal-based attacks are also popular against logic locking. Based on SAS, we propose Robust SAS (RSAS) which is resilient to removal attacks and maintains the same SAT resilience and as effectiveness as SAS. SAS and RSAS have the following significant improvements over existing techniques. (1) SAT resilience of SAS and RSAS against SAT attack is not compromised by increase in effectiveness. (2) In contrast to prior work focusing solely on the circuit-level locking impact, we integrate SAS-locked modules into a processor and show that SAS has a high application-level impact. (3) Our experiments show that SAS and RSAS exhibit better SAT resilience than SFLL and have similar effectiveness.

Late Breaking Results: On the One-Key Premise of Logic Locking

Modeling Techniques for Logic Locking

Quantifying the Efficacy of Logic Locking Methods

Functional Analysis Attacks on Logic Locking

Resynthesis-based Attacks Against Logic Locking

Logic Locking for Secure Outsourced Chip Fabrication: A New Attack and Provably Secure Defense Mechanism

DECOR: Enhancing Logic Locking Against Machine Learning-Based Attacks

A Novel Security Assessment Method Based on Linear Regression for Logic Locking

A critical view on the real-world security of logic locking

Anti-SAT: Mitigating SAT Attack on Logic Locking

Unraveling Latch Locking Using Machine Learning, Boolean Analysis, and ILP

ALL-MASK: A Reconfigurable Logic Locking Method for Multicore Architecture with Sequential-Instruction-Oriented Key

Robust and Attack Resilient Logic Locking with a High Application-Level Impact

Cross-Lock

ATPG-Guided Fault Injection Attacks on Logic Locking

KRATT: QBF-Assisted Removal and Structural Analysis Attack Against Logic Locking

SubLock: Sub-Circuit Replacement based Input Dependent Key-based Logic Locking for Robust IP Protection

Learning Your Lock: Exploiting Structural Vulnerabilities in Logic Locking

Logic Locking at the Frontiers of Machine Learning: A Survey on Developments and Opportunities

TriLock: IC Protection with Tunable Corruptibility and Resilience to SAT and Removal Attacks

CAC 2.0: A Corrupt and Correct Logic Locking Technique Resilient to Structural Analysis Attacks