Abstract:While prior work has explored whether large language models (LLMs) possess a "theory of mind" (ToM) - the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others - there has been little work testing whether LLMs can implicitly apply such knowledge to predict behavior, or to judge whether an observed behavior is rational. Such skills are critical for appropriate interaction in social environments. We create a new dataset, SimpleTom, containing concise, diverse stories (e.g., "The can of Pringles has moldy chips in it. Mary picks up the can in the supermarket and walks to the cashier."), each with three questions that test different degrees of ToM reasoning, asking models to predict (a) mental state ("Is Mary aware of the mold?"), (b) behavior ("Will Mary pay for the chips or report the mold?"), and (c) judgment ("Mary paid for the chips. Was that reasonable?"). To our knowledge, SimpleToM is the first dataset to systematically explore downstream reasoning requiring knowledge of mental states in realistic scenarios. Our experimental results are intriguing: While most models can reliably predict mental state on our dataset (a), they often fail to correctly predict the behavior (b), and fare even worse at judging whether given behaviors are reasonable (c), despite being correctly aware of the protagonist's mental state should make such secondary predictions obvious. We further show that we can help models do better at (b) and (c) via interventions such as reminding the model of its earlier mental state answer and mental-state-specific chain-of-thought prompting, raising the action prediction accuracies (e.g., from 49.5% to 93.5% for GPT-4o) and judgment accuracies (e.g., from 15.3% to 94.7% in GPT-4o). While this shows that models can be coaxed to perform well, it requires task-specific interventions, and the natural model performances remain low, a cautionary tale for LLM deployment.

MuMA-ToM: Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind

MMToM-QA: Multimodal Theory of Mind Question Answering

OpenToM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Theory-of-Mind Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models

SimpleToM: Exposing the Gap between Explicit ToM Inference and Implicit ToM Application in LLMs

ToMBench: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in Large Language Models

MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark

MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI

Through the Theory of Mind's Eye: Reading Minds with Multimodal Video Large Language Models

Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task

Explicit Modelling of Theory of Mind for Belief Prediction in Nonverbal Social Interactions

ToM2C: Target-oriented Multi-agent Communication and Cooperation with Theory of Mind

Multi-ToM: Evaluating Multilingual Theory of Mind Capabilities in Large Language Models

Minding Language Models' (Lack of) Theory of Mind: A Plug-and-Play Multi-Character Belief Tracker

CMMU: A Benchmark for Chinese Multi-modal Multi-type Question Understanding and Reasoning

Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models

ToMChallenges: A Principle-Guided Dataset and Diverse Evaluation Tasks for Exploring Theory of Mind

Tachikuma: Understading Complex Interactions with Multi-Character and Novel Objects by Large Language Models

Memory-Augmented Theory of Mind Network

A Brain-Inspired Model of Theory of Mind