An evidence-accumulating drift-diffusion model of competing information spread on networks

Julien Corsin,Lorenzo Zino,Mengbin Ye

2024-08-22

Abstract:In this paper, we propose an agent-based model of information spread, grounded on psychological insights on the formation and spread of beliefs. In our model, we consider a network of individuals who share two opposing types of information on a specific topic (e.g., pro- vs. anti-vaccine stances), and the accumulation of evidence supporting either type of information is modelled by means of a drift-diffusion process. After formalising the model, we put forward a campaign of Monte Carlo simulations to identify population-wide behaviours emerging from agents' exposure to different sources of information, investigating the impact of the number and persistence of such sources, and the role of the network structure through which the individuals interact. We find similar emergent behaviours for all network structures considered. When there is a single type of information, the main observed emergent behaviour is consensus. When there are opposing information sources, both consensus or polarisation can result; the latter occurs if the number and persistence of the sources exceeds some threshold values. Importantly, we find the emergent behaviour is mainly influenced by how long the information sources are present for, as opposed to how many sources there are.

Physics and Society,Social and Information Networks

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper primarily investigates the mechanisms of information dissemination in networks and attempts to address the following issues:

1. **Psychological basis of information dissemination**: The paper proposes an agent-based model based on psychological insights to describe the process of belief formation and information dissemination. This model considers individuals in a network sharing two opposing types of information (e.g., pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine views) and simulates evidence accumulation through a drift-diffusion process.

2. **Impact of information sources**: Using Monte Carlo simulations, the study examines the influence of the number, persistence, and network structure of different information sources on overall group behavior. Specifically, consensus is typically observed when there is a single type of information source, whereas the presence of opposing information sources can lead to either consensus or polarization. The study finds that the duration of the information source's presence has a greater impact on the final outcome than the number of information sources.

3. **Role of network structure**: The paper also explores the impact of different network structures (such as random regular networks, Watts-Strogatz model, and Barabási-Albert model) on information dissemination and group behavior. The results show that the group behavior produced by the model is consistent across all tested network structures.

In summary, this paper aims to understand how interactions between individuals during the information dissemination process lead to group-level consensus or polarization phenomena and to reveal the mechanisms behind these phenomena.