Abstract:A minimal Kitaev chain, consisting of two quantum dots connected via a superconductor, can host highly localized near-zero-energy states, known as poor man's Majoranas (PMMs). These states have been proposed as promising candidates to study Majorana bound states (MBSs) in a highly tunable setup. However, it is unclear whether and how PMMs observed in real systems are actually connected to the topological phase of the full Kitaev chain. Here, we study PMMs using a microscopic model and show that, in the long chain limit, not all PMMs are related to topological states. Rather, in long chains, some PMMs evolve into trivial highly localized low-energy states. We provide an analytical explanation for the occurrence of these states and show that there is no clear conductance signature that is able to distinguish PMMs that evolve into true topological states from PMMs that evolve into trivial states.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper mainly explores the properties and behaviors of "Poor Man’s Majoranas (PMMs)" in the long Kitaev chain limit. Specifically, the authors attempt to solve the following problems: 1. **The relationship between PMMs and topological phases**: - Whether the PMMs observed in actual systems are indeed related to the topological phases of the Kitaev chain. - Whether all PMMs will evolve into true topological Majorana Bound States (MBSs) in the long - chain limit, or whether some PMMs will evolve into trivial highly - localized low - energy states. 2. **The distinguishing ability of experimental features**: - Whether the existing experimental features (such as zero - bias conductance, etc.) can clearly distinguish which PMMs will evolve into topological states and which will evolve into trivial states. ### Main findings - **Diversity of PMMs**: Through microscopic model research, the authors found that in the long - chain limit, not all PMMs are related to topological states. Some PMMs will evolve into trivial highly - localized low - energy states, not just topological MBSs. - **Lack of clear experimental features**: The existing experimental features (such as zero - bias conductance) cannot clearly distinguish those PMMs that will evolve into topological states from those that will evolve into trivial states. This means that the true nature of PMMs cannot be determined solely by these features. ### Models and methods The authors used a minimal Kitaev chain model containing three Quantum Dots (QDs) to study this problem. Two of the outer QDs simulate the two ends of the Kitaev chain, and the middle QD is coupled by the superconducting proximity effect to form an Andreev Bound State (ABS). The Hamiltonian of this model is: \[ H = \sum_{j = L,R} \left[ \sum_{\sigma=\uparrow,\downarrow} (\mu_j+\sigma\Delta_Z) n_{j,\sigma}+U n_{j,\uparrow} n_{j,\downarrow} \right]+\sum_{\sigma = \uparrow,\downarrow} \mu_M c^\dagger_\sigma c_\sigma+\Delta (c^\dagger_\uparrow c^\dagger_\downarrow + c_\downarrow c_\uparrow)+t \sum_{\sigma,\sigma'=\uparrow,\downarrow} \left[ U_{SOI} \left( \frac{\Phi_{SOI}}{2} \right)_{\sigma\sigma'} (c^\dagger_\sigma d_{1,\sigma'}+d^\dagger_{2,\sigma} c_{\sigma'}) + H.c. \right] \] where: - \( \mu_j \) and \( \Delta_Z \) are the chemical potential and Zeeman energy respectively. - \( U \) is the Coulomb interaction. - \( \Delta \) is the superconducting pairing potential. - \( t \) is the hopping amplitude. - \( U_{SOI} \left( \frac{\Phi_{SOI}}{2} \right)=\cos \left( \frac{\Phi_{SOI}}{2} \right)+i \sin \left( \frac{\Phi_{SOI}}{2} \right)\sigma_y \) is the spin - orbit interaction matrix. Through this model, the authors demonstrated the origin of PMMs and proved that in the long - chain limit, some PMMs will evolve into trivial states rather than topological states. This indicates that in actual experiments, more refined methods are required to distinguish these states. ### Conclusions This paper reveals the complexity of PMMs in the long - chain limit, pointing out that not all PMMs are related to topological states. At the same time, the existing experimental features are not sufficient to distinguish these states, which poses new challenges for future experimental design and theoretical research.

The fate of poor man's Majoranas in the long Kitaev chain limit

From perfect to imperfect poor man's Majoranas in minimal Kitaev chains

Roadmap towards Majorana qubits and nonabelian physics in quantum dot-based minimal Kitaev chains

Interacting Majorana Chain: Transport Properties and Signatures of an Emergent Two-Dimensional Weak Topological Phase

Realization of a minimal Kitaev chain in coupled quantum dots

Interplay between Majorana and Shiba states in a minimal Kitaev chain coupled to a superconductor

Signatures of Majorana protection in a three-site Kitaev chain

Quantum-dot-based Kitaev chains: Majorana quality measures and scaling with increasing chain length

Dynamics and Fusion of Majorana Zero Modes in Quantum-dot based Interacting Kitaev Chains

Majorana fermions in Kitaev chains side-coupled to normal metals

A two-site Kitaev chain in a two-dimensional electron gas

Robust poor man's Majorana zero modes using Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states

Probing Majorana localization in minimal Kitaev chains through a quantum dot

Minimal quantum dot based Kitaev chain with only local superconducting proximity effect

Non-Hermitian Kitaev Chain with Complex On-Site Potentials

Non-Hermitian minimal Kitaev chains

Edge and bulk states in a three-site Kitaev chain

Quasi-Majorana modes in the $p$-wave Kitaev chains on a square lattice

Enhancing the excitation gap of a quantum-dot-based Kitaev chain

Majorana modes in quantum dots coupled via a floating superconducting island