Aircrew rostering workload patterns and associated fatigue and sleepiness scores in short/medium haul flights under RBAC 117 rules in Brazil

Tulio E. Rodrigues,Eduardo Furlan,André F. Helene,Otaviano Helene,Eduardo Pessini,Alexandre Simões,Maurício Pontes,Frida M. Fischer

2024-08-06

Abstract:The relationships between workload and fatigue or sleepiness are investigated through the analysis of rosters and responses to questionnaires from Brazilian aircrews, taken from Fadigômetro database. The approach includes temporal markers - coinciding with Samn-Perelli (SP) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) responses - where SAFTE-FAST model outcomes are calculated. The model results follow the increase of fatigue and sleepiness perceptions during the dawn (0h00 to 05h59), but underestimate the self-rated scores during the evening (18h00 to 23h59). On the other hand, the KSS scores fit the relative risk of pilot errors, representing a reasonable proxy for risk assessment. Linear relationships obtained between workload metrics, computed within 168-hours prior to the responses, and self-rated SP and KSS scores provide a consistent method to estimate accumulated fatigue and sleepiness. Considering 7149 rosters of 2023, the duty time ($DT$), the number of flight sectors ($N_{CREW}$) and the sum of flight sectors with sit periods longer than one hour ($N_{CREW}+N_{SIT}$) are associated with 70.1%/60.6% of the highest predicted scores of SP/KSS. Applying the mitigations $DT\leq44h$, $N_{CREW}\leq15$ and $N_{CREW}+N_{SIT}\leq19$ for every 168-hour interval yields a significant decrease in the higher values of SP/KSS with minimal impact on aircrew productivity.

Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve

This paper aims to explore and analyze the relationship between the workload patterns of short - / medium - range flight crews in Brazil and fatigue and sleepiness. Specifically, the study analyzes the crew schedules and responses to questionnaires, combines the responses of SAMN - PERELLI (SP) and the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), and uses the SAFTE - FAST model to evaluate the levels of fatigue and sleepiness.

### Main problems

1. **Relationship between workload and fatigue / sleepiness**:
- By analyzing the schedules and questionnaire responses, study the relationship between workload indicators (such as total duty time, number of flight segments, number of long - time flights, etc.) and the self - rated fatigue and sleepiness scores of the crew members.
- Explore how these relationships change in different time periods (such as early morning, morning, afternoon, and evening).

2. **Differences between model predictions and actual perceptions**:
- Study the prediction effect of the SAFTE - FAST model in different time periods, especially that the model overestimates the perception of fatigue and sleepiness in the early morning and underestimates these perceptions in the evening.

3. **Risk assessment of fatigue and sleepiness**:
- Through linear relationship analysis, provide a method for estimating cumulative fatigue and sleepiness, and explore the relationship between these indicators and the risk of pilot errors.

4. **Fatigue management strategies**:
- Propose fatigue management strategies based on workload indicators, such as limiting the total duty time, number of flight segments, and number of long - time flights, to reduce the occurrence of high fatigue and sleepiness scores while minimizing the impact on the productivity of the crew members.

### Methods

- **Data collection**:
- Extract questionnaire responses and executed schedules from the Fadigômetro database.
- Calculate the levels of fatigue and sleepiness using the SAFTE - FAST model.

- **Statistical analysis**:
- Apply Pearson correlation analysis and the least - squares method (LSM) to fit linear relationships.
- Use the Mann - Whitney test for hypothesis testing of independent samples.

- **Model validation**:
- Verify the prediction accuracy of the model by comparing the fatigue and sleepiness scores in different time periods.

### Results

- **Relationship between workload and fatigue / sleepiness**:
- There are significant correlations between indicators such as total duty time, number of flight segments, number of long - time flights, etc., and the self - rated fatigue and sleepiness scores.
- Linear relationship analysis shows that these indicators can effectively predict the cumulative levels of fatigue and sleepiness.

- **Differences between model predictions and actual perceptions**:
- The SAFTE - FAST model overestimates the perception of fatigue and sleepiness in the early morning and underestimates these perceptions in the evening.

- **Risk assessment of fatigue and sleepiness**:
- The KSS score is positively correlated with the risk of pilot errors and can be used as an effective proxy indicator for risk assessment.

- **Fatigue management strategies**:
- By limiting the total duty time (≤44 hours), number of flight segments (≤15 segments), and number of long - time flights (≤19 times), high fatigue and sleepiness scores can be significantly reduced with less impact on the productivity of the crew members.

### Conclusion

This study, by analyzing the workload patterns of short - / medium - range flight crews in Brazil, provides an in - depth understanding of the relationship between fatigue and sleepiness and proposes effective fatigue management strategies, which are helpful for improving aviation safety and the health of crew members.