Abstract:As a new programming paradigm, deep learning (DL) has achieved impressive performance in areas such as image processing and speech recognition, and has expanded its application to solve many real-world problems. However, neural networks and DL are normally black-box systems; even worse, DL-based software are vulnerable to threats from abnormal examples, such as adversarial and backdoored examples constructed by attackers with malicious intentions as well as unintentionally mislabeled samples. Therefore, it is important and urgent to detect such abnormal examples. Although various detection approaches have been proposed respectively addressing some specific types of abnormal examples, they suffer from some limitations; until today, this problem is still of considerable interest. In this work, we first propose a novel characterization to distinguish abnormal examples from normal ones based on the observation that abnormal examples have significantly different (adversarial) robustness from normal ones. We systemically analyze those three different types of abnormal samples in terms of robustness and find that they have different characteristics from normal ones. As robustness measurement is computationally expensive and hence can be challenging to scale to large networks, we then propose to effectively and efficiently measure robustness of an input sample using the cost of adversarially attacking the input, which was originally proposed to test robustness of neural networks against adversarial examples. Next, we propose a novel detection method, named attack as detection (A 2 D for short), which uses the cost of adversarially attacking an input instead of robustness to check if it is abnormal. Our detection method is generic, and various adversarial attack methods could be leveraged. Extensive experiments show that A 2 D is more effective than recent promising approaches that were proposed to detect only one specific type of abnormal examples. We also thoroughly discuss possible adaptive attack methods to our adversarial example detection method and show that A 2 D is still effective in defending carefully designed adaptive adversarial attack methods—for example, the attack success rate drops to 0% on CIFAR10.

Detecting adversarial attacks on random samples

Attack As Detection: Using Adversarial Attack Methods to Detect Abnormal Examples.

Identifying Adversarially Attackable and Robust Samples

On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examples

How adversarial attacks can disrupt seemingly stable accurate classifiers

Detecting Adversarial Data via Perturbation Forgery

On the Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Efficient Data-free Adversarial Detection

Sample Attackability in Natural Language Adversarial Attacks

Adversarial Sample Detection Through Neural Network Transport Dynamics

Analyzing Accuracy Loss in Randomized Smoothing Defenses

Detecting adversarial samples by noise injection and denoising

Adversarially Robust Learning with Unknown Perturbation Sets

Small Perturbations Are Enough: Adversarial Attacks on Time Series Prediction

Adversarial attacks and defenses using feature-space stochasticity

Understanding the Robustness of Randomized Feature Defense Against Query-Based Adversarial Attacks

Randomized Prediction Games for Adversarial Machine Learning

Detecting Adversarial Samples through Sharpness of Loss Landscape

Attacking Adversarial Attacks as A Defense

Adversarial Sample Detection for Deep Neural Network through Model Mutation Testing

On the Limitations of Stochastic Pre-processing Defenses

Analysis of Random Perturbations for Robust Convolutional Neural Networks