Abstract:Invasive predators pose a threat to native biodiversity, and their management is hindered by trap‐shyness. Using Bayesian estimation, researchers quantified trap‐shyness in wild brushtail possums, finding a large number of trap‐shy individuals with a low probability of trap interaction. The study suggests that employing multiple lures throughout a trapping operation is more effective than switching lures for reducing possum populations. Invasive predators pose a serious threat to native biodiversity, with trapping being one of several methods developed to manage and monitor their populations. Many individuals in these predator populations have been found to display trap‐shyness, which hinders eradication and results in inaccurate estimates of population size. Lures are used to help overcome trap‐shyness by increasing the probability of interaction with the device, but the extent of trap‐shyness in wild populations, and the best timing for the introduction of a new lure or combination of lures, are uncertain. A key challenge for wildlife managers is maximising the efficacy of invasive predator control, particularly in relation to baiting and trapping, so that pests are extirpated, or survivors are reduced to a minimum. We first use a Bayesian estimation method to quantify trap‐shyness in a population of brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in a New Zealand forest; the resulting estimated parameters are then used to calibrate a stochastic, individual‐based model simulating the outcomes of different luring scenarios. We show that the brushtail possum population analysed was likely split into a smaller, very trappable group and a larger trap‐shy group, with a low mean nightly probability of interaction with traps of 0.28 [0.14–0.56]. Furthermore, our results show that under the assumption of independent attraction levels towards different lures, using a combination of lures simultaneously can result in a greater and faster population knock‐down than using a single lure, or than to switch from one lure to another. The model presented can be used to infer wildlife population trappability from capture data, and our simulation results highlight the potential of improved luring strategies to capture individuals in post‐control residual populations.

TGL-Lambda: An implementation of TrapGrid to estimate trap attractiveness from heterogeneous field data

Trapping Mobile Targets in Wireless Sensor Networks: an Energy-Efficient Perspective

Comparing trap and bait efficiency to record the great crested newts (Triturus cristatus)

Optimising Control Device Luring Strategies for Invasive Predator Control: A Modelling Approach

Trapalyzer: a computer program for quantitative analyses in fluorescent live-imaging studies of neutrophil extracellular trap formation

Live-trapping in the stalk zone of tall grasses as an effective way of monitoring harvest mice (Micromys minutus)

Semiochemical-baited traps as a new method supplementing light traps for faunistic and ecological studies of Macroheterocera (Lepidoptera)

An efficient method for the creation of tunable optical line traps via control of gradient and scattering forces

How Long is Enough to Detect Terrestrial Animals? Estimating the Minimum Trapping Effort on Camera Traps

ToxTrac: A fast and robust software for tracking organisms

Simulation-based evaluation of two insect trapping grids for delimitation surveys

Trap Detection in Brownian Particle Trajectories Using Machine Learning Clustering Methods

Temporary inhibition of positive phototaxis in emigratory population of Nilaparvata lugens by mark-release-recapture

A flexible framework for spatial capture-recapture with unknown identities

Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples

Lure Monitoring for Mediterranean Fruit Fly Traps Using Air Quality Sensors

The Effect of Trap Color on Catches of Monochamus galloprovincialis and Three Most Numerous Non-Target Insect Species

Quadrupole ion traps and trap arrays: geometry, material, scale, performance.

Testing a trapping protocol for generic surveillance of wood-boring beetles in heterogeneous landscapes

Status and Outlook of CHIP-TRAP: the Central Michigan University High Precision Penning Trap

Low-cost floating emergence net and bottle trap: comparison of two designs