Abstract:Experimental measurements and numerical simulations of turbulent flows are characterized by a tradeoff between accuracy and resolution. In this study, we combine accurate sparse pointwise mean velocity measurements with the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations using data assimilation methods. Importantly, we bridge the gap between data assimilation (DA) using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and variational methods based on classical spatial discretization of the flow equations, by comparing both approaches on the same turbulent flow case. First, by constraining the PINN with sparse data and the underdetermined RANS equations without closure, we show that the mean flow is reconstructed to a higher accuracy than a RANS solver using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model. Second, we propose the SA turbulence model augmented PINN (PINN-DA-SA), which outperforms the former approach by up to 73% reduction in mean velocity reconstruction error with coarse measurements. The additional SA physics constraints improve flow reconstructions in regions with high velocity and pressure gradients and separation. Third, we compare the PINN-DA-SA approach to a variational data assimilation using the same sparse velocity measurements and physics constraints. The PINN-DA-SA achieves lower reconstruction error across a range of data resolutions. This is attributed to discretization errors in the variational methodology that are avoided by PINNs. We demonstrate the method using high-fidelity measurements from direct numerical simulation of the turbulent periodic hill at Re=5600 . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.034605 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society

Learning the Latent dynamics of Fluid flows from High-Fidelity Numerical Simulations using Parsimonious Diffusion Maps

Physics-Based Deep Learning for Flow Problems

Validation and parameterization of a novel physics-constrained neural dynamics model applied to turbulent fluid flow

Dynamics of a Data-Driven Low-Dimensional Model of Turbulent Minimal Pipe Flow

Comparing different nonlinear dimensionality reduction techniques for data-driven unsteady fluid flow modeling

Hidden Fluid Mechanics: A Navier-Stokes Informed Deep Learning Framework for Assimilating Flow Visualization Data

Data discovery of low dimensional fluid dynamics of turbulent flows

Recovering missing CFD data for high-order discretizations using deep neural networks and dynamics learning

Numerical Bifurcation Analysis of PDEs From Lattice Boltzmann Model Simulations: a Parsimonious Machine Learning Approach

Exploring Physical Latent Spaces for High-Resolution Flow Restoration

Extracting vector magnitudes of dominant structures in a cyclic engine flow with dimensionality reduction

Nonlinear dimensionality reduction then and now: AIMs for dissipative PDEs in the ML era

PiRD: Physics-informed Residual Diffusion for Flow Field Reconstruction

Improved Greedy Identification of Latent Dynamics with Application to Fluid Flows

Feel the Force: From Local Surface Pressure Measurement to Flow Reconstruction in Fluid-Structure Interaction

Estimation and Control of Fluid Flows Using Sparsity-Promoting Dynamic Mode Decomposition

Interplay of Sensor Quantity, Placement and System Dimensionality on Energy Sparse Reconstruction of Fluid Flows

From snapshots to manifolds - A tale of shear flows

Turbulence model augmented physics-informed neural networks for mean-flow reconstruction

Learning to correct spectral methods for simulating turbulent flows