Abstract:Whether to reset qubits, or not, during quantum error correction experiments is a question of both foundational and practical importance for quantum computing. Text-book quantum error correction demands that qubits are reset after measurement. However, fast qubit reset has proven challenging to execute at high fidelity. Consequently, many cutting-edge quantum error correction experiments are opting for the no-reset approach, where physical reset is not performed. It has recently been postulated that no-reset is functionally equivalent to reset procedures, as well as being faster and easier. For memory experiments, we confirm numerically that resetting provides no benefit. On the other hand, we identify a remarkable difference during logical operations. We find that unconditionally resetting qubits can reduce the duration of fault-tolerant logical operation by up to a factor of two as the number of measurement errors that can be tolerated is doubled. We support this with numerical simulations. However, our simulations also reveal that the no-reset performance is superior if the reset duration or infidelity exceeds a given threshold. Lastly, we introduce two novel syndrome extraction circuits that can reduce the time overhead of no-reset approaches. Our findings provide guidance on how experimentalists should design future experiments.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether qubits need to be reset in quantum error - correction experiments. Specifically, the paper explores whether qubits should be reset after measurement during the quantum error - correction process, which is a problem of both fundamental theoretical significance and practical application value. Traditional quantum error - correction methods require qubits to be reset after each measurement, but achieving qubit reset quickly and with high fidelity is technically challenging. Therefore, many cutting - edge quantum error - correction experiments have chosen the no - reset method. Through numerical simulation and other analytical means, the paper compares the performance differences between the reset and no - reset methods under different conditions, especially the impact on logical operations. ### Main findings of the paper: 1. **Impact in quantum storage experiments**: - For quantum storage experiments, the paper confirms that resetting or not has almost no significant impact on quantum error - correction performance. This supports previous research conclusions that in the quantum storage scenario, the no - reset scheme does not significantly reduce the performance of quantum error - correction. 2. **Impact in logical operations**: - However, when performing logical operations, the paper has found significant differences. Unconditional reset can reduce the time of fault - tolerant logical operations by up to two times because the number of tolerable measurement errors is doubled. However, if the reset time is too long or the reset fidelity is below a certain threshold, the performance of the no - reset scheme will be better. 3. **New syndrome - extraction circuits**: - The paper also proposes two new syndrome - extraction circuits, which significantly reduce the time cost without using unconditional reset. One circuit converts a classification error into two milder errors by adding a two - qubit gate; the other circuit improves the performance of quantum error - correction by using two auxiliary qubits to compress two measurement rounds. ### Conclusion: Through detailed analysis and numerical simulation of different reset strategies, the paper provides guidance for experimental design. The research results show that the choice of which reset strategy depends on specific experimental conditions and technical parameters. In the short term, when the physical error rate is high, the no - reset scheme usually performs better; in the future, when technological progress makes reset faster and with higher fidelity, unconditional reset may become a better choice. In addition, the new syndrome - extraction circuits proposed in the paper provide new ideas for future quantum error - correction experiments.

To reset, or not to reset -- that is the question

Fundamental Bounds on Qubit Reset

Optimizing resetting of superconducting qubits

Collective advantages in qubit reset: effect of coherent qubits

Optimally Fast Qubit Reset

Verification of a resetting protocol for an uncontrolled superconducting qubit

Optimal Qubit Reuse for Near-Term Quantum Computers

Qubit reset with a shortcut-to-isothermal scheme

Stochastic resetting in discrete-time quantum dynamics: steady states and correlations in few-qubit systems

Photonic Realization of Quantum Resetting

Quantum state preparation via engineered ancilla resetting

Rapid and unconditional parametric reset protocol for tunable superconducting qubits

Designing non-equilibrium states of quantum matter through stochastic resetting

Qubit recycling and the path counting problem

Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even

Quest for optimal quantum resetting: Protocols for a particle on a chain

Fast unconditional reset and leakage reduction in fixed-frequency transmon qubits

Impossibility of achieving Landauer's bound for almost every quantum state