Abstract:It is possible to make a detector which clicks after absorbing a single graviton. Similarly, it is possible to make a gravitational wave detector which can see the quantum noise induced by certain highly squeezed states of the graviton. However, contrary to some recent arguments in the literature, observation of either or both of these signals would not constitute proof or even evidence that the gravitational field is quantized. This is a simple technical statement: a classical gravitational wave can produce the same output data in a detector. Here we explain this result, presented earlier in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2308.12988" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12988">arXiv:2308.12988</a>, which is a straightforward extension of an ancient argument in quantum optics.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology,High Energy Physics - Theory,Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The problems the paper attempts to solve
This paper attempts to explore and clarify whether detecting a single graviton or the quantum noise of gravitational waves in a highly compressed state can be regarded as evidence for the quantization of the gravitational field. Specifically, the author Daniel Carney points out in the paper that even if a detector capable of detecting a single graviton can be designed, or the quantum noise of gravitational waves caused by a highly compressed state can be observed, these observations cannot be taken as proof or evidence of the quantization of the gravitational field. This is because classical gravitational waves can also produce the same output data in the detector.
### The main arguments of the paper
1. **Graviton detection and classical gravitational waves**:
- The author proposes two models to describe the coupling between the detector and the incident gravitational signal:
\[
\hat{H}_q = \hat{H}_{\text{det}} - \int d^3x \hat{h}_{\mu\nu} \hat{T}^{\mu\nu}_{\text{det}}
\]
\[
\hat{H}_{cl} = \hat{H}_{\text{det}} - \int d^3x h_{\mu\nu} \hat{T}^{\mu\nu}_{\text{det}}
\]
- In these two models, the detector itself is treated as a quantum system, and the difference lies in whether the gravitational field perturbation \( h_{\mu\nu} \) is treated as a quantum field (denoted with a hat) or a classical field (without a hat). The author points out that any realistic "graviton" signal can be explained by one of these two models.
2. **Photon - detection analogy**:
- To further illustrate this point, the author uses the analogy of the electromagnetic field and photon detection. By analyzing the photoelectric effect, the author shows that the classical electromagnetic field model (i.e., the non - quantized electromagnetic field) and the quantized electromagnetic field model are equivalent in predicting the discrete photoelectron click - through rate.
- This means that it is impossible to distinguish whether the electromagnetic field is quantized just by observing the photoelectron click - through rate, and the same principle also applies to the gravitational field.
3. **Non - classicality test**:
- The author discusses methods of distinguishing classical and quantum models through statistical correlations. For example, certain non - classical quantum states (such as squeezed states) can produce sub - Poisson statistics, which cannot be explained by the classical model.
- However, for gravitational wave detectors, due to their extremely low efficiency (for example, the efficiency in the CAST experiment is about \( 10^{-33} \)), it is almost impossible to actually observe sub - Poisson statistics.
4. **LIGO and squeezed gravitons**:
- Finally, the author discusses in detail the response of the LIGO detector to the squeezed gravitational wave signal. Although the squeezed state does produce additional noise, most of this noise can be explained by classical random signals, and only the sub - vacuum noise part requires a quantum explanation, and this part is unobservable in actual detectors.
### Conclusion
The core question of this paper is: **Can detecting a single graviton or the quantum noise of gravitational waves be regarded as evidence for the quantization of the gravitational field?**
The author's answer is: **No**. Because classical gravitational waves can also produce similar observational results, so it is impossible to distinguish whether the gravitational field is quantized just by these observational results. To truly verify the quantization of the gravitational field, more complex experimental designs and higher - precision measurement techniques are required.