Dry Needling with the Use of FRSc Technique in Addition to Standard Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Both PROMs and Measurement Tools
Joanna Rajfur,Katarzyna Rajfur,Tomasz Matusz,Maria Malarska,Karolina Walewicz,Kuba Ptaszkowski,Robert Dymarek,Jakub Taradaj
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s450119
IF: 2.8319
2024-03-13
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Joanna Rajfur, 1 Katarzyna Rajfur, 1 Tomasz Matusz, 1 Maria Malarska, 2 Karolina Walewicz, 3 Kuba Ptaszkowski, 4 Robert Dymarek, 4 Jakub Taradaj 5 1 Institute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, 45-040, Poland; 2 Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, 90-419, Poland; 3 Department of Physiotherapy, Jan Grodek State University, Sanok, 38-500, Poland; 4 Department of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, 50-368, Poland; 5 Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, 40-065, Poland Correspondence: Joanna Rajfur, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, Katowicka 68, Opole, 46-020, Poland, Tel +48 506 202 372, Email Purpose: Dry needling (DN) has gained popularity for musculoskeletal conditions, but its commercial use often surpasses scientific evidence. The novel Five Regulatory Systems Concept (FRSc) of DN shows potential therapeutic mechanisms, including chronic low back pain (LBP). However, rigorous clinical assessment with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective measures are necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of DN according to pain levels, postural control and selected gait parameters in patients with chronic LBP. Patients and Methods: This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study involved 30 patients with LBP allocated in the experimental (n=15, rehabilitation+ FRSc DN) or control group (n=15, rehabilitation + sham DN). The Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used as PROMs. Moreover, the posturography method for posture and balance control and the treadmill for gait analysis were used as objective tools. Measurements were taken before and immediately after the intervention and during 1- and 3-month follow up. Results: There was a statistically significantly greater improvement in the RMQ in the experimental group compared to the controls (p=0.923 before and p< 0.001 after treatment, as well as p< 0.001 after 1 and 3 months). Despite the favorable analgesic effect, a significant advantage of the experimental group over the controls in this respect is worth noting (p=0.001 in favor of DN in all intergroup comparisons concerning results from the subjective assessment of pain (VAS). A statistically insignificant post-treatment improvement in balance and postural stability was noted in both groups, although the effects appeared to be short-term. Surprisingly, again, DN had no advantage over sham interventions. In both groups, all changes in the swing phase were statistically insignificant (p=0.201 for the dominant and p=0.283 for the non-dominant side) for the initial swing phase. In both groups, all changes in the stance phase were statistically insignificant (p=0.480 for the dominant and p=0.410 for the non-dominant side of the body). Conclusion: DN based on the FRSc appears promising as an effective adjunct to standard rehabilitation for LBP, showing improvements in functional performance and pain reduction. Keywords: low back pain, dry needling, rehabilitation, postural control, gait analysis Over recent years, dry needling (DN) has been gaining popularity as a treatment method for musculoskeletal conditions. 1–3 Yet, it cannot be disregarded that the commercial use of that therapy significantly outpaces reliable scientific evidence. Moreover, there is no recognized and uniform clinical practice protocol, which further hinders the reliable application of dry needling according to the principles of Evidence-Based Physiotherapy. As mentioned above, there are many ways to apply this method in daily practice. One interesting technique is applying needle therapy according to the novel Five Regulatory Systems Concept (FRSc). This is a novel method, which, however, requires substantial scientific validation. Regrettably, both basic research and recommended clinical papers of high methodological value on this subject are lacking. There are popular courses and training for FRSc. It is a popular method used in the practice of physiotherapists. Its advocates generally believe that FRSc is based on therapeutic mechanisms such as the release of fascial structures and relaxation within the surrounding tissues, stimulation of local outflow of lymph, venous blood, and extracellular fluid, as well as analgesic effects and stimulation of proprioceptive perception. 4,5 Unfortunately, these mechanisms have not been unambiguously confirmed by a considerable number of animal experiments, in vitro or in vivo. In 2022, results from the world's first clinical study of DN according to the FRSc concept were -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology