Shaping Integrity: Why Generative Artificial Intelligence Does Not Have to Undermine Education

Myles Joshua Toledo Tan,Nicholle Mae Amor Tan Maravilla
2024-10-11
Abstract:This paper examines the role of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in promoting academic integrity within educational settings. It explores how AI can be ethically integrated into classrooms to enhance learning experiences, foster intrinsic motivation, and support voluntary behavior change among students. By analyzing established ethical frameworks and educational theories such as deontological ethics, consequentialism, constructivist learning, and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the paper argues that GAI, when used responsibly, can enhance digital literacy, encourage genuine knowledge construction, and uphold ethical standards in education. This research highlights the potential of GAI to create enriching, personalized learning environments that prepare students to navigate the complexities of the modern world ethically and effectively.
Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of how to responsibly integrate Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in education to support rather than undermine academic integrity. Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects: 1. **Ethical Framework**: By referencing virtue ethics (such as Kant's moral principles) and consequentialism (such as Mill's utilitarianism), it discusses how to ensure that the use of AI technology in education meets ethical standards, promotes students' digital literacy, intrinsic motivation, and authentic learning experiences. 2. **Shift in Assessment Methods**: It explores the potential impact of GAI on traditional assessment methods, proposing a shift towards more authentic assessments that focus on higher-order thinking skills, such as project tasks and real-world problem-solving activities, to reduce the likelihood of academic misconduct and encourage students to actively engage with course materials. 3. **Constructivist Learning Theory**: It discusses how GAI can be combined with constructivist learning theory to provide personalized learning opportunities, support students in actively exploring, interacting, and constructing knowledge, thereby enhancing learning outcomes. 4. **Self-Determination Theory (SDT)**: It analyzes how GAI can promote intrinsic motivation by meeting students' needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, thereby increasing student engagement and academic integrity. 5. **Digital Literacy and Ethical Education**: It emphasizes the importance of educating students and teachers about how AI works, its potential biases and limitations, and how to use AI tools responsibly, in order to cultivate their critical and ethical digital literacy. The core goal of the paper is to demonstrate that through responsible integration and ethical education, AI can not only support academic integrity but also enhance students' intrinsic motivation and learning quality, better preparing them for the complexities of the modern world.