Abstract:Real-time lightweight time series anomaly detection has become increasingly crucial in cybersecurity and many other domains. Its ability to adapt to unforeseen pattern changes and swiftly identify anomalies enables prompt responses and critical decision-making. While several such anomaly detection approaches have been introduced in recent years, they primarily utilize a single type of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and have been implemented in only one deep learning framework. It is unclear how the use of different types of RNNs available in various deep learning frameworks affects the performance of these anomaly detection approaches due to the absence of comprehensive evaluations. Arbitrarily choosing a RNN variant and a deep learning framework to implement an anomaly detection approach may not reflect its true performance and could potentially mislead users into favoring one approach over another. In this paper, we aim to study the influence of various types of RNNs available in popular deep learning frameworks on real-time lightweight time series anomaly detection. We reviewed several state-of-the-art approaches and implemented a representative anomaly detection approach using well-known RNN variants supported by three widely recognized deep learning frameworks. A comprehensive evaluation is then conducted to analyze the performance of each implementation across real-world, open-source time series datasets. The evaluation results provide valuable guidance for selecting the appropriate RNN variant and deep learning framework for real-time, lightweight time series anomaly detection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to study the impact of different recurrent neural network (RNN) variants and deep - learning frameworks on real - time lightweight time - series anomaly detection. Specifically, the paper attempts to solve the following key problems:
1. **The impact of different RNN variants**:
- Most current time - series anomaly detection methods only use a single type of RNN (such as LSTM), and are usually implemented in a specific deep - learning framework.
- The paper hopes to evaluate the performance differences among different types of RNNs (such as traditional RNN, LSTM, and GRU) in real - time lightweight time - series anomaly detection by comparing them.
2. **The impact of different deep - learning frameworks**:
- The choice of deep - learning framework may affect the performance of the model, including detection accuracy and time efficiency.
- The paper evaluates the impact of these frameworks on performance by implementing the same anomaly detection method on multiple popular deep - learning frameworks (such as TensorFlow - Keras, PyTorch, and Deeplearning4j).
3. **Comprehensive evaluation and guidance**:
- The paper hopes to provide a comprehensive evaluation to help users choose the appropriate RNN variant and deep - learning framework to optimize the effect of real - time lightweight time - series anomaly detection.
- Through experimental verification, the paper provides valuable guidance for practical applications, ensuring that users can choose the optimal combination according to specific situations.
### Research background of the paper
With the development of the Internet of Things (IoT), a large amount of time - series data is continuously generated. Analyzing these data and detecting anomalies in them are crucial for businesses and organizations. Time - series anomaly detection can help identify potential security threats, system failures, and other problems, thereby improving decision - making efficiency. However, existing methods often have the following limitations:
- **Single RNN type**: Most methods only use one RNN variant and cannot comprehensively evaluate the effects of different RNN variants.
- **Single deep - learning framework**: Existing research is usually carried out in a specific deep - learning framework and lacks cross - framework comparison.
- **Lack of comprehensive evaluation**: There is no comprehensive evaluation of the specific impact of different RNN variants and deep - learning frameworks on performance.
Therefore, this paper fills this gap and provides a more comprehensive understanding and guidance for real - time lightweight time - series anomaly detection through a systematic study of multiple RNN variants and deep - learning frameworks.
### Experimental design
To achieve the above goals, the paper selects RePAD2 as the research object and implements three RNN variants (RNN, LSTM, and GRU) in three different deep - learning frameworks (TensorFlow - Keras, PyTorch, and Deeplearning4j). Then, through a series of experiments, the performance of different implementations is evaluated based on a real - world air - quality time - series data set.
### Conclusion
The experimental results show that the choice of RNN variant and deep - learning framework significantly affects the accuracy and time efficiency of anomaly detection. Therefore, when designing and implementing highly adaptable, real - time, and lightweight time - series anomaly detection methods, it is crucial to carefully choose the RNN variant and deep - learning framework.