Abstract:SIAM Journal on Computing, Volume 53, Issue 1, Page 1-46, February 2024. We consider the problem of finding nearly optimal solutions of optimization problems with random objective functions. Such problems arise widely in the theory of random graphs, theoretical computer science, and statistical physics. Two concrete problems we consider are (a) optimizing the Hamiltonian of a spherical or Ising [math]-spin glass model and (b) finding a large independent set in a sparse Erdős–Rényi graph. The following families of algorithms are considered: (a) low-degree polynomials of the input—a general framework that captures many prior algorithms; (b) low-depth Boolean circuits; (c) the Langevin dynamics algorithm, a canonical Monte Carlo analogue of the gradient descent algorithm. We show that these families of algorithms cannot have high success probability. For the case of Boolean circuits, our results improve the state-of-the-art bounds known in circuit complexity theory (although we consider the search problem as opposed to the decision problem). Our proof uses the fact that these models are known to exhibit a variant of the overlap gap property (OGP) of near-optimal solutions. Specifically, for both models, every two solutions whose objectives are above a certain threshold are either close to or far from each other. The crux of our proof is that the classes of algorithms we consider exhibit a form of stability (noise-insensitivity): a small perturbation of the input induces a small perturbation of the output. We show by an interpolation argument that stable algorithms cannot overcome the OGP barrier. The stability of Langevin dynamics is an immediate consequence of the well-posedness of stochastic differential equations. The stability of low-degree polynomials and Boolean circuits is established using tools from Gaussian and Boolean analysis—namely hypercontractivity and total influence, as well as a novel lower bound for random walks avoiding certain subsets, which we expect to be of independent interest. In the case of Boolean circuits, the result also makes use of Linial–Mansour–Nisan's classical theorem. Our techniques apply more broadly to low influence functions, and we expect that they may apply more generally.

Hardness of sampling solutions from the Symmetric Binary Perceptron

On the atypical solutions of the symmetric binary perceptron

Critical Window of The Symmetric Perceptron

How to escape atypical regions in the symmetric binary perceptron: a journey through connected-solutions states

Clustering of solutions in the symmetric binary perceptron

Discrepancy Algorithms for the Binary Perceptron

Locally Sampleable Uniform Symmetric Distributions

Understanding the computational difficulty of a binary-weight perceptron and the advantage of input sparseness

Learning Hard-Constrained Models with One Sample

Typical and atypical solutions in non-convex neural networks with discrete and continuous weights

On the average-case hardness of BosonSampling

The Sample Complexity of One-Hidden-Layer Neural Networks

Hardness of classically sampling one clean qubit model with constant total variation distance error

Sampling Permutations Satisfying Constraints within and beyond the Local Lemma Regime

Classical sampling from noisy Boson Sampling and the negative probabilities

Fair Sampling of Ground-State Configurations of Binary Optimization Problems.

Storage capacity in symmetric binary perceptrons

Sampling Constraint Satisfaction Solutions in the Local Lemma Regime

Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics

On the hardness of learning under symmetries