Abstract:There has been a significant surge of interest recently around the concept of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), where the goal is to produce an interpretation for a decision made by a machine learning algorithm. Of particular interest is the interpretation of how deep neural networks make decisions, given the complexity and `black box' nature of such networks. Given the infancy of the field, there has been very limited exploration into the assessment of the performance of explainability methods, with most evaluations centered around subjective visual interpretation of the produced interpretations. In this study, we explore a more machine-centric strategy for quantifying the performance of explainability methods on deep neural networks via the notion of decision-making impact analysis. We introduce two quantitative performance metrics: i) Impact Score, which assesses the percentage of critical factors with either strong confidence reduction impact or decision changing impact, and ii) Impact Coverage, which assesses the percentage coverage of adversarially impacted factors in the input. A comprehensive analysis using this approach was conducted on several state-of-the-art explainability methods (LIME, SHAP, Expected Gradients, GSInquire) on a ResNet-50 deep convolutional neural network using a subset of ImageNet for the task of image classification. Experimental results show that the critical regions identified by LIME within the tested images had the lowest impact on the decision-making process of the network (~38%), with progressive increase in decision-making impact for SHAP (~44%), Expected Gradients (~51%), and GSInquire (~76%). While by no means perfect, the hope is that the proposed machine-centric strategy helps push the conversation forward towards better metrics for evaluating explainability methods and improve trust in deep neural networks.

Explaining Decisions in ML Models: a Parameterized Complexity Analysis

Distance-Restricted Explanations: Theoretical Underpinnings & Efficient Implementation

Explaining Explanations in AI

Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning

Critical Empirical Study on Black-box Explanations in AI

Explaining Any ML Model? -- On Goals and Capabilities of XAI

Interpretable and explainable machine learning: A methods‐centric overview with concrete examples

Explain To Decide: A Human-Centric Review on the Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in AI-assisted Decision Making

Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach

Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems

Accountable and Explainable Methods for Complex Reasoning over Text

Do Explanations Reflect Decisions? A Machine-centric Strategy to Quantify the Performance of Explainability Algorithms

Explainability of Artificial Intelligence Models: Technical Foundations and Legal Principles

Local vs. Global Interpretability: A Computational Complexity Perspective

Explainable AI without Interpretable Model

A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learning

Model Interpretation and Explainability: Towards Creating Transparency in Prediction Models

How do ML practitioners perceive explainability? an interview study of practices and challenges

Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Review

Unveiling the Black Box: A Comprehensive Review of Explainable AI Techniques

Minimalistic Explanations: Capturing the Essence of Decisions