Xiaobai Zhu,Kenneth Q. Zhou,Zijia Wang
Abstract:The significance of mortality modeling extends across multiple research areas, ranging from life insurance valuation to optimal lifetime decision-making. Existing approaches, such as mortality laws and factor-based models, often fall short in capturing the complexity of individual mortality, hindering their ability to address specific research needs. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduces a novel approach to mortality modeling centered on the dynamics of individual vitality. A four-component framework is developed to account for initial conditions, natural aging processes, stochastic fluctuations, and accidental events over an individual's lifetime. We demonstrate the framework's analytical capabilities across various settings and explore its practical implications in solving life insurance problems and deriving optimal lifetime decisions. Our results show that the proposed framework not only encompasses existing mortality models but also provides individualized mortality outcomes and offers an intuitive explanation for survival biases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the inadequacy of existing mortality models in capturing the complexity of individual mortality. Traditional mortality models, such as mortality laws and factor-based models, often fail to adequately reflect differences in individual health status and random events throughout the life cycle, limiting their applicability to specific research needs. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a new mortality modeling approach centered on individual vitality dynamics, describing changes in an individual's life vitality through a framework consisting of four components: initial conditions, natural aging process, random fluctuations, and accidental events.
Specifically, the main contributions of the paper include:
1. **Introduction of a vitality-based mortality modeling framework**: It is assumed that each individual has an initial vitality level, which gradually depletes to zero over time due to natural causes and external factors, leading to death. This framework includes four components: initial vitality level, natural decay trend, random diffusion, and sudden jumps.
2. **Application of the framework under different specifications**: It is demonstrated that certain specifications can represent existing mortality models, while other specifications can generate more diverse modeling results. For each specification, the authors derive survival probabilities and other related attributes to illustrate how the vitality-based framework can complement and enhance existing models, better describing the complex mortality dynamics at the individual level.
3. **Practical applications**: The paper discusses the practical applications of the vitality-based framework in various research fields, including calculating life expectancy, pricing insurance products, and making optimal consumption decisions. Additionally, it derives probabilities of disability and recovery, analyzes different causes of death, and explains the phenomena of underestimation and overestimation of survival probabilities within the vitality-based framework.
Through these contributions, the paper aims to provide a more personalized, flexible, and intuitive mortality modeling approach to improve actuarial practice and inform optimal decision-making.