Rethinking Digitalization and Climate: Don't Predict, Mitigate

Daria Gritsenko,Jon Aaen,Bent Flyvbjerg

2024-06-17

Abstract:Digitalization is a core component of the green transition. Today's focus is on quantifying and pre-dicting the climate effects of digitalization through various life-cycle assessments and baseline sce-nario methodologies. Here we argue that this is a mistake. Most attempts at prediction are based on three implicit assumptions: (a) the digital carbon footprint can be quantified, (b) business-as-usual with episodic change leading to a new era of stability, and (c) investments in digitalization will be delivered within the cost, timeframe, and benefits described in their business cases. We problema-tize each assumption within the context of digitalization and argue that the digital carbon footprint is inherently unpredictable. We build on uncertainty literature to show that even if you cannot predict, you can still mitigate. On that basis, we propose to rethink practice on the digital carbon footprint from prediction to mitigation.

Computers and Society,General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the relationship between digitalization processes and climate change, and presents the viewpoint that in the face of high uncertainty, we should shift from prediction to mitigation strategies.

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Address

1. **Challenging the Status Quo**: Current research and practice tend to quantify and predict the impact of digitalization on the climate, but these attempts are based on assumptions that may not hold true.

2. **Introducing a New Perspective**: The authors believe that the carbon footprint of digitalization is inherently unpredictable, and therefore suggest rethinking the current approach, namely shifting from attempting precise predictions to focusing on mitigation strategies.

3. **Specific Recommendations**:
- **Utilization of Renewable Energy**: Accelerate the transition to renewable energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions generated during digitalization.
- **Organizational Change**: Adapt to the continuously changing digital environment by adopting flexible and responsive strategies to manage digitalization projects.
- **Improving Project Execution**: Enhance the delivery quality of digital green initiative projects to reduce cost overruns, delays, and insufficient benefits.

### Core Arguments

- **Uncertainty Issue**: Existing prediction methods are based on three assumptions: (a) the carbon footprint of digitalization can be quantified; (b) business as usual, with occasional changes leading to new periods of stability; (c) digital investments will be completed within the expected cost, time, and benefit parameters. However, these assumptions may not hold true in practice.

- **Response Strategies**:
- Shift focus to the use of renewable energy, which is seen as a "tsunami wall" against the climate impact of digitalization.
- Adopt a perspective of continuous change to manage digitalization projects, recognizing that digital technologies and their applications are constantly evolving.
- Improve the execution of digital projects to reduce extreme cost overruns.

In summary, the paper aims to challenge the current direction of research and practice regarding digitalization and climate change and advocates for more pragmatic mitigation measures to address the unpredictable climate impacts of the digitalization process.