Abstract:Local amplitude aberrations caused by scintillation can impact the reconstruction process of a wavefront sensor (WFS) by inducing a spatially non-uniform intensity at the pupil plane. This effect is especially relevant for the commonly-used Shack-Hartmann WFS (SHWFS), which can lose slope information for portions of the beam where the signal is faint, leading to reduced reconstruction performance and eventually total failure as the level of scintillation increases. An alternative WFS is needed for such conditions. The nonlinear curvature wavefront sensor (nlCWFS) has been shown to achieve better sensitivity compared to the SHWFS under low light levels. Additionally, the nlCWFS has demonstrated the ability to maintain its sensitivity in the presence of scintillation, using amplitude aberrations to help inform the reconstruction process, rather than hinder. Experiments to date have thus far only shown reconstruction results for a single scintillation value. Building upon previous simulations and laboratory experiments, we have built a testbed to quantify the effects of varying scintillation strength on the wavefront reconstruction performance of the nlCWFS compared to an equivalent SHWFS. In this paper, we present results showing the difference in performance between the nlCWFS and SHWFS as a function of relative flux and scintillation strength.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the problem of the performance differences of wave - front sensors (WFS) under different scintillation intensities. Specifically, the paper focuses on the performance of the nonlinear curvature wave - front sensor (nlCWFS) and the commonly - used Shack - Hartmann wave - front sensor (SHWFS) when facing local amplitude distortions caused by scintillation. ### Main problems 1. **The influence of scintillation on wave - front sensors**: - Scintillation can lead to a spatially non - uniform intensity distribution on the pupil plane, thus affecting the reconstruction process of the wave - front sensor. - For the commonly - used SHWFS, slope information may be lost in the weaker - signal parts of the beam, resulting in a decline in reconstruction performance and even complete failure, especially when the scintillation intensity increases. 2. **Finding alternatives**: - A wave - front sensor that can maintain good performance under high - scintillation conditions is required. - The nlCWFS has been proven to have better sensitivity at low light levels and can maintain its sensitivity in the presence of scintillation, using amplitude distortion to assist the reconstruction process rather than hindering it. ### Research objectives The paper quantifies the influence of different scintillation intensities on the wave - front reconstruction performance of nlCWFS and SHWFS through experiments to evaluate the relative performance of these two sensors under different conditions. Specifically, the research attempts to answer the following questions: - What are the performance differences between nlCWFS and SHWFS under different relative fluxes and scintillation intensities? - Can nlCWFS maintain its superior performance at higher scintillation intensities? ### Experimental methods To achieve the above objectives, the researchers designed and built an experimental platform to measure and compare the wave - front reconstruction accuracy of nlCWFS and SHWFS under different scintillation intensities. In the experiment, a single - mode fiber laser with variable intensity, a phase plate, a lens system and other optical elements were used to simulate the atmospheric turbulence effect, and the scintillation intensity was adjusted by changing the position of the phase plate. ### Key formula The scintillation index \( S \) is defined as: \[ S = \sqrt{\frac{\langle I^2 \rangle - \langle I \rangle^2}{\langle I \rangle}} \] where \( I = I(x, y) \) represents the intensity measured at the system pupil, and \( \langle \cdot \rangle \) represents spatial averaging. Through these experiments, the researchers hope to verify whether nlCWFS can maintain its advantage over SHWFS under different scintillation intensities, especially when the scintillation intensity increases.

Performance of the Nonlinear Curvature Wavefront Sensor as a Function of Scintillation Strength

Assessing Phase Reconstruction Accuracy for Different Nonlinear Curvature Wavefront Sensor Configurations

A New Type Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor Using Liquid Crystal Display

A new shack-hartmann type wavefront sensor using liquid crystal panels

Developing an Error Budget for the Nonlinear Curvature Wavefront Sensor

Measuring Phase Errors in the Presence of Scintillation

Learning-based Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor for High-Order Aberration Detection.

High Sensitivity Wavefront Sensing with a non-linear Curvature Wavefront Sensor

Experimental Trials With The Optical Differentiation Wavefront Sensor For Extended Objects

Centroiding and Extraction of Tip/Tilt Information from Nonlinear Curvature Wavefront Sensor Measurements

A Framework for Iterative Phase Retrieval Technique Integration into Atmospheric Adaptive Optics—Part I: Wavefront Sensing in Strong Scintillations

Using the Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm to reconstruct non-modulated pyramid wavefront sensor measurements

Into nonlinearity and beyond for Zernike-like wavefront sensors

Nonlinear techniques for few-mode wavefront sensors

Making the unmodulated Pyramid wavefront sensor smart. Closed-loop demonstration of neural network wavefront reconstruction with MagAO-X

Shack Hartmann wavefront sensor with array of phase coded masks

The crossed-sine wavefront sensor: first tests and results

Wavefront reconstruction based on ASH-Net with less lenslets SHWFS

Fast single pixel modal wavefront sensing using neural networks

Photonic lantern wavefront reconstruction in a multi-wavefront sensor single-conjugate adaptive optics system