Undermining Mental Proof: How AI Can Make Cooperation Harder by Making Thinking Easier

Zachary Wojtowicz,Simon DeDeo
2024-07-20
Abstract:Large language models and other highly capable AI systems ease the burdens of deciding what to say or do, but this very ease can undermine the effectiveness of our actions in social contexts. We explain this apparent tension by introducing the integrative theoretical concept of "mental proof," which occurs when observable actions are used to certify unobservable mental facts. From hiring to dating, mental proofs enable people to credibly communicate values, intentions, states of knowledge, and other private features of their minds to one another in low-trust environments where honesty cannot be easily enforced. Drawing on results from economics, theoretical biology, and computer science, we describe the core theoretical mechanisms that enable people to effect mental proofs. An analysis of these mechanisms clarifies when and how artificial intelligence can make low-trust cooperation harder despite making thinking easier.
Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How does artificial intelligence (AI), while making thinking easier, instead make cooperation in low - trust environments more difficult?** Specifically, the paper explores how AI, by reducing the cost of thinking, undermines the mechanism that people use to authenticate unobservable mental states in social interactions, namely "mental proof". This mechanism is especially important in low - trust environments because it allows people to credibly convey private mental characteristics such as values, intentions, and knowledge states when honesty cannot be easily enforced. ### Background and Motivation of the Main Problem With the emergence of large - language models and other high - performance AI systems, decision - making and expression have become easier, but this has also weakened the effectiveness of our actions, especially in social contexts. The author introduces the concept of "mental proof" to explain this contradictory phenomenon. Mental proof refers to the authentication of unobservable mental facts through observable behaviors. For example, in scenarios such as recruitment and dating, people use mental proof to credibly convey their intentions, value orientations, and knowledge states. ### The Impact of AI on Mental Proof The paper points out that the widespread application of AI enables anyone to cheaply and convincingly simulate the output of human intellectual activities. Although this brings many benefits, it also begins to disrupt a series of social practices. For example, AI - generated content may undermine the effectiveness of behaviors such as sincere apologies, university evaluations, online dating, and wedding vows. These behaviors originally relied on mental proof to establish trust, but now, due to the existence of AI, it has become difficult to distinguish between true and false. ### Significance of the Research Understanding the impact of AI on mental proof is crucial because mental proof is especially critical in low - trust environments. Individuals in these environments not only need to declare certain mental facts but also need to strive to prove the authenticity of these facts. However, the popularization of AI has significantly reduced, or even eliminated, the cost of these proofs, thereby weakening their credibility. This change particularly affects those who cannot rely on high - trust networks and formal institutions and may exacerbate existing social inequalities. ### Conclusions and Recommendations Finally, the paper proposes strategies to address these problems, emphasizing the importance of clearly distinguishing between human - and machine - generated content in the AI era. This not only helps to preserve the effectiveness of mental proof but also ensures that the technological progress brought by AI does not damage the foundation of social cooperation. ### Explanation of Formulas and Charts The article does not involve complex mathematical or physical - chemical formulas, but it mentions some concepts in economics and social sciences, such as signaling theory and proof of knowledge protocols. These concepts can be briefly represented as follows: - **Signaling theory**: Describes the mechanism by which individuals transmit information through behaviors that bear real costs. \[ \text{Cost}_{\text{signal}} > \text{Cost}_{\text{fake}} \] - **Proof of knowledge protocols**: Ensure that one party can prove to another that it has certain knowledge or ability without revealing additional information. \[ \text{Completeness} \quad \text{and} \quad \text{Validity} \] These mechanisms together explain why AI undermines mental proof and suggest directions for future research and technological development.