A "Rosetta Stone" for Studies of Spatial Variation in Astrophysical Data: Power Spectra, Semivariograms, and Structure Functions

Benjamin Metha,Sabrina Berger

2024-07-19

Abstract:From the turbulent interstellar medium to the cosmic web, astronomers in many different fields have needed to make sense of spatial data describing our Universe, spanning centimetre to Gigaparsec scales. Through different historical choices for mathematical conventions, many different subfields of spatial data analysis have evolved their own language for analysing structures and quantifying correlation in spatial data. Because of this history, terminology from a myriad of different fields is used, often to describe two data products that are mathematically identical. In this Note, we define and describe the differences and similarities between the power spectrum, the two-point correlation function, the covariance function, the semivariogram, and the structure functions, in an effort to unify the languages used to study spatial correlation. We also highlight under which conditions these data products are useful and describe how the results found using one method can be translated to those found using another, allowing for easier comparison between different subfields' native methods. We hope for this document to be a ``Rosetta Stone" for translating between different statistical approaches, allowing results to be shared between researchers from different backgrounds, facilitating more cross-disciplinary approaches to data analysis.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to solve the problem of the lack of uniformity in terms and methods used by different disciplines when analyzing spatial data. Specifically, the author hopes to create a "Rosetta Stone" to help researchers understand and translate various statistical methods used to describe spatial correlations in different fields. The following are the main objectives of this paper:

1. **Unifying the language**: By defining and explaining the differences and similarities among the power spectrum, two - point correlation function, covariance function, semivariogram, and structure functions, it helps researchers in different fields understand each other's methods.

2. **Promoting interdisciplinary cooperation**: For historical reasons, different sub - fields have developed their own terms and methods when analyzing spatial data. This has led to communication barriers among researchers. This paper hopes to provide a unified framework so that researchers from different backgrounds can more easily share results and promote interdisciplinary cooperation.

3. **Clarifying the applicable conditions**: The article also discusses under what conditions these different data analysis methods are most useful and explains how to convert the results of one method into those of another method for comparison and verification.

4. **Providing teaching resources**: To help readers better understand these methods, the author also provides an interactive Jupyter notebook, which contains Python implementations of all the methods discussed and random field samples to which these methods can be applied. This not only helps readers gain numerical intuition but also provides ready - made code implementations for readers to apply in their own research.

In short, the goal of this paper is to bridge the terminological and technical gaps in spatial data analysis among different disciplines, enabling researchers to communicate and cooperate more effectively.