Abstract:Online Large Language Model (LLM) services such as ChatGPT and Claude 3 have transformed business operations and academic research by effortlessly enabling new opportunities. However, due to data-sharing restrictions, sectors such as healthcare and finance prefer to deploy local LLM applications using costly hardware resources. This scenario requires a balance between the effectiveness advantages of LLMs and significant financial burdens. Additionally, the rapid evolution of models increases the frequency and redundancy of benchmarking efforts. Existing benchmarking toolkits, which typically focus on effectiveness, often overlook economic considerations, making their findings less applicable to practical scenarios. To address these challenges, we introduce CEBench, an open-source toolkit specifically designed for multi-objective benchmarking that focuses on the critical trade-offs between expenditure and effectiveness required for LLM deployments. CEBench allows for easy modifications through configuration files, enabling stakeholders to effectively assess and optimize these trade-offs. This strategic capability supports crucial decision-making processes aimed at maximizing effectiveness while minimizing cost impacts. By streamlining the evaluation process and emphasizing cost-effectiveness, CEBench seeks to facilitate the development of economically viable AI solutions across various industries and research fields. The code and demonstration are available in \url{<a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/amademicnoboday12/CEBench" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>}.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on two aspects: 1. **Challenges in the Convenience of Benchmarking**: Although there are already many existing toolkits aiming to simplify the benchmarking of large language models (LLMs), a great deal of coding work is still required each time an LLM application is evaluated. These tasks include model deployment, configuration of data loaders and vector databases to support retrieval - augmented generation (RAG), as well as collection and analysis of evaluation results. These tasks require an integrated benchmarking toolkit that enables users to benchmark a wide range of LLM application scenarios without writing code. 2. **Challenges in Cost - effective Benchmarking**: Most evaluation toolkits and benchmarking mainly focus on the generation quality of LLMs, while often ignoring the cost implications of deploying these models. For example, the Llama3 model with 70B parameters scores 79.0 on the BoolQ task, while the model with 8B parameters can achieve 95.8% performance with only 11.75% of the memory requirements. If a slight performance degradation is acceptable, using the model with 8B parameters can significantly reduce costs, especially when combined with RAG technology to improve model performance. However, few toolkits have considered the overall application and cost of the RAG - integrated LLM pipeline, which highlights the need for benchmarking that supports cost - benefit trade - offs. To solve these problems, the paper introduces CEBench, an open - source multi - objective benchmarking toolkit that focuses on the crucial trade - off between cost and effectiveness, which is vital in business and research. The core functions of CEBench allow users to strategically evaluate and optimize these trade - offs through simple configuration, thus supporting budget - sensitive decision - making. By simplifying the evaluation process and emphasizing cost - effectiveness, CEBench aims to support the development of economically viable AI solutions across various industries and research fields.

CEBench: A Benchmarking Toolkit for the Cost-Effectiveness of LLM Pipelines

AIBench: an Industry Standard AI Benchmark Suite from Internet Services.

AIBench: An Agile Domain-specific Benchmarking Methodology and an AI Benchmark Suite

Aibench: an industry standard ai benchmark suite

Personalized Benchmarking with the Ludwig Benchmarking Toolkit

Planning, Creation, Usage: Benchmarking LLMs for Comprehensive Tool Utilization in Real-World Complex Scenarios

Bench-CoE: a Framework for Collaboration of Experts from Benchmark

CIBench: Evaluating Your LLMs with a Code Interpreter Plugin

INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent

LLMCBench: Benchmarking Large Language Model Compression for Efficient Deployment

From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline

API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs

ElecBench: a Power Dispatch Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domain

BabelBench: An Omni Benchmark for Code-Driven Analysis of Multimodal and Multistructured Data

Do These LLM Benchmarks Agree? Fixing Benchmark Evaluation with BenchBench

ECBD: Evidence-Centered Benchmark Design for NLP

SecBench: A Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking Dataset for LLMs in Cybersecurity

LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Models

TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation

FinDABench: Benchmarking Financial Data Analysis Ability of Large Language Models