GPT Assisted Annotation of Rhetorical and Linguistic Features for Interpretable Propaganda Technique Detection in News Text

Kyle Hamilton,Luca Longo,Bojan Bozic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651909
2024-07-16
Abstract:While the use of machine learning for the detection of propaganda techniques in text has garnered considerable attention, most approaches focus on "black-box" solutions with opaque inner workings. Interpretable approaches provide a solution, however, they depend on careful feature engineering and costly expert annotated data. Additionally, language features specific to propagandistic text are generally the focus of rhetoricians or linguists, and there is no data set labeled with such features suitable for machine learning. This study codifies 22 rhetorical and linguistic features identified in literature related to the language of persuasion for the purpose of annotating an existing data set labeled with propaganda techniques. To help human experts annotate natural language sentences with these features, RhetAnn, a web application, was specifically designed to minimize an otherwise considerable mental effort. Finally, a small set of annotated data was used to fine-tune GPT-3.5, a generative large language model (LLM), to annotate the remaining data while optimizing for financial cost and classification accuracy. This study demonstrates how combining a small number of human annotated examples with GPT can be an effective strategy for scaling the annotation process at a fraction of the cost of traditional annotation relying solely on human experts. The results are on par with the best performing model at the time of writing, namely GPT-4, at 10x less the cost. Our contribution is a set of features, their properties, definitions, and examples in a machine-readable format, along with the code for RhetAnn and the GPT prompts and fine-tuning procedures for advancing state-of-the-art interpretable propaganda technique detection.
Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the following issues: 1. **Interpretability Issue**: While the use of machine learning to detect propaganda techniques in news texts has received widespread attention, most methods rely on "black-box" solutions that lack transparency. Interpretable methods require careful feature engineering and expensive manually labeled data. 2. **Language Feature Annotation Issue**: Language features related to propaganda are often of interest to rhetoricians or linguists, but there are no suitable datasets for machine learning to annotate these features. 3. **Efficient Annotation Strategy**: The paper proposes a method that combines a small number of manually labeled samples with a GPT model to significantly reduce the cost of traditional annotation, which relies entirely on human experts, and to improve classification accuracy. Through the above work, the paper demonstrates how to effectively combine a small number of manually labeled samples with GPT to extend the annotation process at a lower cost, achieving results comparable to the state-of-the-art models at the time (such as GPT-4), with only one-tenth of the cost.