Inferring dark energy properties from the scale factor parametrisation

Upala Mukhopadhayay,Sandeep Haridasu,Anjan A Sen,Suhail Dhawan

2024-07-15

Abstract:We propose and implement a novel test to assess deviations from well-established concordance $\Lambda$CDM cosmology while inferring dark energy properties. In contrast to the commonly implemented parametric forms of the dark energy equation-of-state (EoS), we test the validity of the cosmological constant on the more fundamental scale factor [$a(t)$] which determines the expansion rate of the Universe. We constrain our extended `general model' for the expansion history using the late-time cosmological observables, namely Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Supernovae. As a primary inference, we contrast the BAO compilations from the completed SDSS and the more recent DESI. We find that the former deviates from the $\Lambda$CDM scenario at a mild $\sim 2\sigma$ level while the latter is completely consistent with the standard picture when the dark energy properties are inferred. We find that the posterior of the dark energy EoS is mainly constrained to be quintessence-like, however, we demonstrate the rich phenomenology of dark energy behaviour that can be obtained in our general model wrt to the $\Lambda$CDM.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the deviation from the standard ΛCDM cosmological model, especially when inferring the properties of dark energy. Specifically, the authors propose a new testing method to evaluate the validity of the cosmological constant through the more fundamental scale factor [a(t)], rather than the commonly used parametric form of the dark energy equation of state. They use late - universe observational data, such as baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and supernovae (SNIa), to constrain the expansion history in the extended "general model" and explore the impact of these data on the properties of dark energy.

### Main research questions
1. **Evaluating the deviation from the standard ΛCDM model**:
- The authors evaluate the validity of the cosmological constant through the change of the scale factor [a(t)], rather than directly using the equation of state of dark energy.
- Use late - universe observational data (such as BAO and SNIa) to constrain model parameters and evaluate whether these data support the standard ΛCDM model or there are significant deviations.

2. **Inferring the properties of dark energy**:
- Infer the equation of state of dark energy through the extended "general model", especially its change with redshift.
- Explore the impact of different observational data (such as BAO data from SDSS and DESI) on the properties of dark energy.

3. **Verifying the validity of the model**:
- Verify the validity and reliability of the model by comparing the constraints on model parameters from different observational data sets (such as BAO data from SDSS and DESI).
- Evaluate the performance of the model in explaining current cosmological observational data, especially in comparison with the standard ΛCDM model.

### Specific research content
- **Model construction**:
- Propose an extended scale factor model [a(t) = a_2/B [sinh(t/τ)]^B], where [a_1] and [B] are dimensionless parameters and [τ] is a time parameter.
- Derive the corresponding expression for the evolution of the Hubble parameter with redshift [H^2(z) = H_0^2 [A(1 + z)^(2/B)+(1 - A)]].

- **Data analysis**:
- Use BAO data from SDSS and DESI, as well as SNIa data from Pantheon +, to constrain model parameters.
- Analyze the constraints on model parameters from different data sets, especially the impact on the properties of dark energy.

- **Results and discussion**:
- It is found that SDSS BAO data deviate from the standard ΛCDM model at about 2σ level, while DESI BAO data are completely consistent.
- The constraints in the model parameter space show that most of the allowed parameter regions conform to quintic - term dark energy behavior, but there are also some regions showing the possibility of negative dark energy density.
- By comparing with the CPL parameterization model, it is found that the general model provides better constraints on dark energy behavior under current cosmological conditions and avoids unphysical parameter regions.

### Conclusion
- This research provides a new method to evaluate the deviation from the standard ΛCDM model through the extended scale factor model.
- The constraints on model parameters from different observational data sets (such as BAO data from SDSS and DESI) show different results, indicating that more high - precision data are needed to further verify the validity of the model.
- The model performs well in explaining current cosmological observational data, especially when inferring the properties of dark energy, providing a more reasonable physical explanation.