Abstract:Background: Network theory is largely applied in real-world systems to assess landscape connectivity using empirical or theoretical networks. Empirical networks are usually built from discontinuous individual movement trajectories without knowing the effect of relocation frequency on the assessment of landscape connectivity while theoretical networks generally rely on simple movement rules. We investigated the combined effects of relocation sampling frequency and landscape fragmentation on the assessment of landscape connectivity using simulated trajectories and empirical high-resolution (1 Hz) trajectories of Alpine ibex (Capra ibex). We also quantified the capacity of commonly used theoretical networks to accurately predict landscape connectivity from multiple movement processes. Methods: We simulated forager trajectories from continuous correlated biased random walks in simulated landscapes with three levels of landscape fragmentation. High-resolution ibex trajectories were reconstructed using GPS-enabled multi-sensor biologging data and the dead-reckoning technique. For both simulated and empirical trajectories, we generated spatial networks from regularly resampled trajectories and assessed changes in their topology and information loss depending on the resampling frequency and landscape fragmentation. We finally built commonly used theoretical networks in the same landscapes and compared their predictions to actual connectivity. Results: We demonstrated that an accurate assessment of landscape connectivity can be severely hampered (e.g., up to 66% of undetected visited patches and 29% of spurious links) when the relocation frequency is too coarse compared to the temporal dynamics of animal movement. However, the level of landscape fragmentation and underlying movement processes can both mitigate the effect of relocation sampling frequency. We also showed that network topologies emerging from different movement behaviours and a wide range of landscape fragmentation were complex, and that commonly used theoretical networks accurately predicted only 30-50% of landscape connectivity in such environments. Conclusions: Very high-resolution trajectories were generally necessary to accurately identify complex network topologies and avoid the generation of spurious information on landscape connectivity. New technologies providing such high-resolution datasets over long periods should thus grow in the movement ecology sphere. In addition, commonly used theoretical models should be applied with caution to the study of landscape connectivity in real-world systems as they did not perform well as predictive tools.

Implication of modelling choices on connectivity estimation: A comparative analysis

Bringing circuit theory into spatial occupancy models to assess landscape connectivity

Using simulation modeling to demonstrate the performance of graph theory metrics and connectivity algorithms

Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models

A comprehensive framework to assess multi‐species landscape connectivity

Landscape connectivity modeling from the perspective of animal dispersal

Dispersal-based species pools as sources of connectivity area mismatches

Combined effects of landscape fragmentation and sampling frequency of movement data on the assessment of landscape connectivity

Spatiotemporal connectivity dynamics in spatially structured populations

Multiple habitat graphs: how connectivity brings forth landscape ecological processes

Habitat amount and connectivity in forest planning models: Consequences for profitability and compensation schemes

A rapid assessment methodology for quantifying and visualizing functional landscape connectivity

Large-landscape connectivity models for pond-dwelling species: methods and application to two invasive amphibians of global concern

Structural Uncertainty in Models Projecting the Consequences of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Biodiversity

Accounting for Connectivity Uncertainties in Predicting Roadkills: a Comparative Approach between Path Selection Functions and Habitat Suitability Models

Measuring landscape connectivity: On the importance of within-patch connectivity

Unravelling the effects of individual heterogeneity on connectivity estimates: Insights from Spatial Capture-Recapture modelling

Static vs dynamic connectivity: how landscape changes affect connectivity predictions in the Iberian Peninsula

Are human-induced changes good or bad to dynamic landscape connectivity?

Testing the Influence of Seascape Connectivity on Marine-Based Species Distribution Models

An approximation approach to spatial connectivity for a data-limited endangered species with implications for habitat restoration