Abstract:We revisit a graph width parameter that we dub bipartite treewidth, along with its associated graph decomposition that we call bipartite tree decomposition. Bipartite treewidth can be seen as a common generalization of treewidth and the odd cycle transversal number. Intuitively, a bipartite tree decomposition is a tree decomposition whose bags induce almost bipartite graphs and whose adhesions contain at most one vertex from the bipartite part of any other bag, while the width of such decomposition measures how far the bags are from being bipartite. Adapted from a tree decomposition originally defined by Demaine, Hajiaghayi, and Kawarabayashi [SODA 2010] and explicitly defined by Tazari [Th. Comp. Sci. 2012], bipartite treewidth appears to play a crucial role for solving problems related to odd-minors, which have recently attracted considerable attention. As a first step toward a theory for solving these problems efficiently, the main goal of this paper is to develop dynamic programming techniques to solve problems on graphs of small bipartite treewidth. For such graphs, we provide a number of para-NP-completeness results, FPT-algorithms, and XP-algorithms, as well as several open problems. In particular, we show that $K_t$-Subgraph-Cover, Weighted Vertex Cover/Independent Set, Odd Cycle Transversal, and Maximum Weighted Cut are $FPT$ parameterized by bipartite treewidth. We provide the following complexity dichotomy when $H$ is a 2-connected graph, for each of $H$-Subgraph-Packing, $H$-Induced-Packing, $H$-Scattered-Packing, and $H$-Odd-Minor-Packing problem: if $H$ is bipartite, then the problem is para-NP-complete parameterized by bipartite treewidth while, if $H$ is non-bipartite, then it is solvable in XP-time. We define 1-${\cal H}$-treewidth by replacing the bipartite graph class by any class ${\cal H}$. Most of the technology developed here works for this more general parameter.

Tree Independence Number IV. Even-hole-free Graphs

Tree independence number II. Three-path-configurations

Tree independence number I. (Even hole, diamond, pyramid)‐free graphs

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions XV. Even-hole-free graphs with bounded clique number have logarithmic treewidth

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions X. Towards logarithmic treewidth for even-hole-free graphs

On the tree-width of even-hole-free graphs

The maximum number of maximum generalized 4‐independent sets in trees

Sparse graphs with bounded induced cycle packing number have logarithmic treewidth

The Independence Number Conditions for 2-Factors of a Claw-Free Graph

Treewidth versus clique number. II. Tree-independence number

The independence polynomial of trees is not always log-concave starting from order 26

Tree independence number III. Thetas, prisms and stars

Treewidth versus clique number. IV. Tree-independence number of graphs excluding an induced star

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions XI. Local structure in even-hole-free graphs of large treewidth

A note on the alternating number of independent sets in a graph

Dynamic programming on bipartite tree decompositions

Product Structure and Tree-Decompositions

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions XIII. Basic obstructions in $\mathcal{H}$-free graphs for finite $\mathcal{H}$

Embedding Trees in Graphs with Independence Number Two.

One Tree to Rule Them All: Poly-Logarithmic Universal Steiner Tree