Abstract:BackgroundIn the United States, about 3 million people have autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and around 1 out of 59 children are diagnosed with ASD. People with ASD have characteristic social communication deficits and repetitive behaviors. The causes of this disorder remain unknown; however, in up to 25% of cases, a genetic cause can be identified. Detecting ASD as early as possible is desirable because early detection of ASD enables timely interventions in children with ASD. Identification of ASD based on objective pathogenic mutation screening is the major first step toward early intervention and effective treatment of affected children. ObjectiveRecent investigation interrogated genomics data for detecting and treating autism disorders, in addition to the conventional clinical interview as a diagnostic test. Since deep neural networks perform better than shallow machine learning models on complex and high-dimensional data, in this study, we sought to apply deep learning to genetic data obtained across thousands of simplex families at risk for ASD to identify contributory mutations and to create an advanced diagnostic classifier for autism screening. MethodsAfter preprocessing the genomics data from the Simons Simplex Collection, we extracted top ranking common variants that may be protective or pathogenic for autism based on a chi-square test. A convolutional neural network–based diagnostic classifier was then designed using the identified significant common variants to predict autism. The performance was then compared with shallow machine learning–based classifiers and randomly selected common variants. ResultsThe selected contributory common variants were significantly enriched in chromosome X while chromosome Y was also discriminatory in determining the identification of autistic individuals from nonautistic individuals. The ARSD, MAGEB16, and MXRA5 genes had the largest effect in the contributory variants. Thus, screening algorithms were adapted to include these common variants. The deep learning model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.955 and an accuracy of 88% for identifying autistic individuals from nonautistic individuals. Our classifier demonstrated a considerable improvement of ~13% in terms of classification accuracy compared to standard autism screening tools. ConclusionsCommon variants are informative for autism identification. Our findings also suggest that the deep learning process is a reliable method for distinguishing the diseased group from the control group based on the common variants of autism.

Synthetic Electroretinogram Signal Generation Using Conditional Generative Adversarial Network for Enhancing Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder

Attention to the Electroretinogram: Gated Multilayer Perceptron for ASD Classification

Generating synthetic light-adapted electroretinogram waveforms using Artificial Intelligence to improve classification of retinal conditions in under-represented populations

Diagnostic Classification and Prognostic Prediction Using Common Genetic Variants in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Genotype-Based Deep Learning

Enhancing Electroretinogram Classification with Multi-Wavelet Analysis and Visual Transformer

A Trend on Autism Spectrum Disorder Research: Eye Tracking-EEG Correlative Analytics.

Advancing ASD identification with neuroimaging: a novel GARL methodology integrating Deep Q-Learning and generative adversarial networks

ASD-GANNet: A Generative Adversarial Network-Inspired Deep Learning Approach for the Classification of Autism Brain Disorder

Generation of synthetic EEG data for training algorithms supporting the diagnosis of major depressive disorder

ASD-DiagNet: A Hybrid Learning Approach for Detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using fMRI Data

Electroretinogram Analysis Using a Short-Time Fourier Transform and Machine Learning Techniques

Enhancing Autism Detection Through Gaze Analysis Using Eye Tracking Sensors and Data Attribution with Distillation in Deep Neural Networks

Discrete Wavelet Transform Analysis of the Electroretinogram in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Transparent deep learning to identify autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in EHR using clinical notes

Brain-region specific autism prediction from electroencephalogram signals using graph convolution neural network

Detecting Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Using Multimodal Time-Frequency Analysis with Machine Learning Using the Electroretinogram from Two Flash Strengths

Optimal Combination of Mother Wavelet and AI Model for Precise Classification of Pediatric Electroretinogram Signals

Video-Based Autism Detection with Deep Learning

Development of an Automated Electroretinography Analysis Approach

SynSigGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Synthetic Biomedical Signal Generation

EEG data augmentation using Wasserstein GAN