A short perspective on a posteriori error control and adaptive discretizations

Roland Becker,Stéphane P.A. Bordas,Franz Chouly,Pascal Omnes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aams.2024.03.002
2024-07-10
Abstract:Error control by means of a posteriori error estimators or indica-tors and adaptive discretizations, such as adaptive mesh refinement, have emerged in the late seventies. Since then, numerous theoretical developments and improvements have been made, as well as the first attempts to introduce them into real-life industrial applications. The present introductory chapter provides an overview of the subject, highlights some of the achievements to date and discusses possible perspectives.
Numerical Analysis
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: how to control and improve the accuracy and computational efficiency of numerical solutions of partial differential equations through a posteriori error estimators and adaptive discretization techniques, such as adaptive mesh refinement. Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects: 1. **Error control**: Evaluate the accuracy of numerical solutions through a posteriori error estimators. Different from a priori error estimators, a posteriori error estimators evaluate the error of the solution after the calculation, thus providing a more practical error evaluation. 2. **Adaptive discretization**: Use adaptive methods (such as adaptive mesh refinement) to optimize the accuracy of numerical solutions. These methods can dynamically adjust discretization parameters according to the information provided by error estimators to better approximate the exact solution. 3. **Theoretical basis and development**: Review and summarize the theoretical development and improvement of a posteriori error estimators and adaptive discretization techniques since the 1970s, and discuss their initial attempts in practical industrial applications. 4. **Application prospects**: Explore the possible future development directions and application scenarios of these techniques, especially their applications in complex systems, real - time prediction, and certified numerical simulations. The main purpose of the paper is to provide readers with a comprehensive overview of a posteriori error estimators and adaptive discretization techniques, emphasizing the importance of these tools in improving the accuracy and efficiency of numerical simulations. At the same time, the paper also points out some challenges in current research and future research directions. ### Formula example One of the key formulas mentioned in the paper is the relationship between the error estimator and the discretization error: \[ \eta_N(u_N) \simeq \epsilon_N(u, u_N) \] where: - \(\eta_N(u_N)\) is the error estimator depending on the discrete solution \(u_N\). - \(\epsilon_N(u, u_N)\) is the discretization error, defined as: \[ \epsilon_N(u, u_N) := \|u - u_N\|_V \] Here, \(\| \cdot \|_V\) represents the natural norm associated with the Banach or Hilbert space \(V\) (for example, the Sobolev norm or the energy norm).