Suppressing photon detection errors in nondeterministic state preparation

Csaba Czabán,Zoltán Kolarovszki,Márton Karácsony,Zoltán Zimborás
2024-07-10
Abstract:Photonic quantum computing has recently emerged as a promising candidate for fault-tolerant quantum computing by photonic qubits. These protocols make use of nondeterministic gates, enabling universal quantum computation. However, the suggested solutions heavily use particle number resolving detectors (PNRDs), which are experimentally hard to realize and are usually biased in practice. We investigate the possibility of suppressing such errors caused by such photodetector imperfections by adjusting the optimal beamsplitter and phaseshifter angles in the interferometer corresponding to nondeterministic gates. Moreover, we devise an optimization method for determining the adjusted angles, which may achieve higher output state fidelities while controlling the success probabilities of the nondeterministic gates.
Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to suppress errors caused by non - ideal photon detectors in optical - quantum computing. Specifically, the paper focuses on the error problems that occur when using particle - number - resolving detectors (PNRDs) during non - deterministic state preparation. ### Problem Background Optical - quantum computing is a technology with the potential to achieve fault - tolerant quantum computing, operating with photons as qubits. However, this computing method depends on non - deterministic gate operations, and the success of these gate operations depends on the measurement results of the photon number in the ancilla modes. Currently, most schemes rely on particle - number - resolving detectors (PNRDs), but these detectors have defects in practical applications, such as being unable to accurately resolve the photon number, resulting in inaccurate measurement results and thus affecting the fidelity of the final output state. ### Specific Problems 1. **Detector Defects**: The PNRDs actually used are not detectors in an ideal state. They may produce statistical errors, leading to inaccurate measurement results. 2. **Fidelity Degradation**: Due to the imperfection of the detectors, the output state obtained after non - deterministic gate operations is no longer the expected state but a mixed state, thus reducing the fidelity of the output state. 3. **Success Probability Control**: While improving the fidelity of the output state, it is necessary to ensure that the success probability of non - deterministic gate operations is not too low to guarantee the efficiency of the computation. ### Solution The paper proposes a method based on quantum - state learning to adjust the angles of beam splitters and phase shifters in the interferometer to optimize non - deterministic gate operations. The specific steps are as follows: 1. **Modeling and Analysis**: First, the authors establish a statistical model of non - ideal detectors, describing the response characteristics of the detectors under different photon - number inputs. 2. **Optimization Objective**: A loss function is defined, combining the fidelity of the output state and the success probability, to guide the optimization process. The form of the loss function is: \[ L(\theta)=1 - \sqrt{\langle\psi^{*}|\rho_{\text{out}}(\theta)|\psi^{*}\rangle}+\alpha \, \text{softplus}_\beta(S^{*}-S(\theta)) \] where $\theta$ represents the angle parameter of the interferometer, $\rho_{\text{out}}(\theta)$ is the output - state density matrix, $\langle\psi^{*}|$ is the target state, $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are hyperparameters, $S^{*}$ is the set success - probability threshold, and $\text{softplus}_\beta(x)=\frac{1}{\beta}\log(1 + e^{\beta x})$ is the softplus function, which is used for smoothing the success - probability constraint conditions. 3. **Optimization Algorithm**: The Adam optimizer is used for gradient descent to gradually adjust the angle parameters of the interferometer to minimize the loss function, thereby improving the fidelity of the output state and controlling the success probability. ### Experimental Results Through experimental verification, this method can significantly improve the fidelity of the output state while maintaining a relatively high success probability. The experimental results show that even using detectors at the current technological level, it is possible to prepare small - scale resource states with high fidelity, demonstrating the effectiveness of this method. ### Conclusion This research provides an effective solution. By adjusting the interferometer configuration to suppress errors caused by non - ideal detectors, it improves the fidelity of non - deterministic state preparation in optical - quantum computing and can control the success probability within a certain range, providing important technical support for the future practical applications of optical - quantum computing.