Abstract:We revisit the physics of hole-conjugate Fractional Quantum Hall (FQH) phases characterized by counter-propagating edge channels at filling factors above 1/2. We propose a minimal and intuitive model that successfully accounts for all experimentally observed features, introducing a paradigm shift in the understanding of hole-conjugate edge channel dynamics. Our model identifies inter-channel charge equilibration as the sole essential mechanism, eliminating the need to invoke charge modes or upstream neutral modes, as posited in prior theoretical frameworks. By incorporating fictitious reservoirs along the edge, the model qualitatively and quantitatively reproduces key observations, including counterintuitive upstream effects previously misattributed to neutral modes. We provide predictions for electrical and thermal conductance as well as current noise for filling factors 2/3 and 3/5. Additionally, we address the case of non-dissipative reservoirs, which preserve conductance properties while exhibiting infinite thermal relaxation lengths

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the dynamic mechanism of the counter - propagating edge channels in the hole - conjugate phase of the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE). Specifically, the paper mainly focuses on the cases of filling factors 2/3 and 3/5, where the experimental observations in these cases are inconsistent with the predictions of early theoretical models. ### Main problems 1. **Inconsistency between experiment and theory**: Early theoretical models cannot explain the conductivity values observed in experiments. For example, in the case of a filling factor of 2/3, the total conductivity predicted by the theory is 4/3 \( \times \) \( \frac{e^2}{h} \), while that observed in the experiment is 2/3 \( \times \) \( \frac{e^2}{h} \). Similarly, for a filling factor of 3/5, the conductivity predicted by the theory is 7/5 \( \times \) \( \frac{e^2}{h} \), while that observed in the experiment is 3/5 \( \times \) \( \frac{e^2}{h} \). 2. **The role of neutral modes**: Early models introduced neutral modes to explain these differences, but the existence and role of these modes in actual experiments are still in doubt. In particular, whether neutral modes can propagate on the micron scale and produce observable effects is a controversial point. ### Solutions in the paper The paper proposes a new, intuitive and powerful model, and re - examines these problems by introducing fictional reservoirs (Landauer reservoirs and Energy - Preserving Reservoirs) distributed along the edge. The main contributions of this model are as follows: - **Eliminating the neutral mode hypothesis**: The paper points out that all experimentally observed phenomena can be explained only by considering the charge equilibration between counter - propagating channels, without the need to introduce neutral modes or charge modes. - **Reproducing key experimental phenomena**: The model can qualitatively and quantitatively reproduce key experimental phenomena, including the upstream effects previously misattributed to neutral modes. - **Predicting conductivity and other physical quantities**: The model provides specific predictions for conductivity, thermal conductivity and current noise, and these predictions are consistent with experimental results. ### Formula summary - For a filling factor of 2/3: - Conductivity formula: \[ G_N=\frac{2}{3}\left(1 + \frac{1}{3}e^{-\lambda N}\right)/\left(1-\frac{1}{3}e^{-\lambda N}\right) \] - Upstream current: \[ I_{\text{upstr}}=\frac{2}{3}V\frac{e^{-(N + 1)\lambda}}{1 - e^{-(N + 1)\lambda}} \] - For a filling factor of 3/5: - Conductivity formula: \[ G_N=\frac{3}{5}\left(1+\frac{2}{5}e^{-\lambda N}\right)/\left(1-\frac{2}{5}e^{-\lambda N}\right) \] - Thermal conductivity formula: \[ \dot{Q}_n = -\frac{\kappa_0}{2}\frac{T_R^2 - T_L^2}{2^{N+1}-1} \] Through these improvements, the paper provides a simpler and physically intuitive way to understand the complex phenomena in the fractional quantum Hall effect and solves the long - standing problem of inconsistency between theory and experiment.

Revisiting the Physics of Hole-Conjugate Fractional Quantum Hall Channels

Fractional Quantum Hall Effect at Ν = 5/2: Ground States, Non-Abelian Quasiholes, and Edge Modes in a Microscopic Model

Fractional Quantum Hall Bilayers at Half-Filling: Tunneling-driven Non-Abelian Phase

Anisotropy and Quench Dynamics of Quasiholes in Fractional Quantum Hall Liquids

A ug 2 01 6 Fractional Quantum Hall Bilayers at Half-Filling : Tunneli ng-driven Non-Abelian Phase

Ground State and Edge Excitations of A Quantum Hall Liquid at Filling Factor 2/3

Striped Quantum Hall State in A Half-filled Landau Level

Quasihole Tunneling in Disordered Fractional Quantum Hall Systems

The Universal Edge Physics in Fractional Quantum Hall Liquids

Edge-induced Topological Phase Transition of the Quantum Hall State at Half Filling

Unusual Quasiparticles and Tunneling Conductance in Quantum Point Contacts in Fractional Quantum Hall Systems

Scaling and non-Abelian signature in fractional quantum Hall quasiparticle tunneling amplitude

Edge-mode Velocities and Thermal Coherence of Quantum Hall Interferometers

Fractional Quantum Hall States with Gapped Boundaries in an Extreme Lattice Limit

From Fractional Chern Insulators To Abelian And Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall States: Adiabatic Continuity And Orbital Entanglement Spectrum

Edge Reconstruction In The Fractional Quantum Hall Regime

Quasiparticle tunneling in the Moore-Read fractional quantum Hall State

Unusual quasiparticles and tunneling conductance in quantum point contacts in $ν=2/3$ fractional quantum Hall systems

Quasiparticle Tunneling Across an Exciton Condensate.

Refermionized theory of the edge modes of a fractional quantum Hall cloud

Fermionic fractional quantum Hall states: A modern approach to systems with bulk-edge correspondence