Abstract:Decisions with consequences that play out over time are ubiquitous in business, policy, and family relations, and frequently the agent making such a decision is not the one who bears the consequences. We use a lab experiment to examine whether individuals make different intertemporal decisions for others of varying social distance than for themselves. Subjects make a series of intertemporal work time allocation decisions for themselves and for another individual, either a friend or a stranger. We find that if they do not receive information about the decision recipient, people choose more impatiently (moving more disutility cost into the future) for others than for themselves. In other words, a decision made for you by an uninformed proxy is more impatient than a decision you would make for yourself and thus is probably suboptimal. This result contrasts with some of the literature, a divergence that may be because most of those studies are in the benefit domain while ours is in the cost domain and because (as we find in a separate survey) people perceive procrastination as qualitatively different from other discounting decisions. We provide evidence that this bias in proxy decisions exists because benevolent decision-makers believe their decision recipients to be more impatient than they actually are. First, survey evidence suggests that uninformed individuals believe that they are more patient than other subjects. Second, when the decision-maker sees information about how patient the recipient believes herself to be, this impatience bias disappears if the recipient is a friend. Taken together, our results show that given limited information, proxy decision-makers choose more impatiently than principals would prefer, but information can mitigate this suboptimal choice if social distance is low. Our results also suggest that intertemporal choice may not be behaviorally the same over time as over money.

Comparative Patience

Patience ensures fairness

Better is Worse, Worse is Better: Reexamination of Violations of Dominance in Intertemporal Choice

Rank Preserving Preferences

When the Counterpart Chooses the Opposite: the First Mover’s Anticipation and Evaluation of the Final Feedback in Gambles

Patience among children

Patience Sorting and Its Generalizations

On Some Implications of Backward Discounting

Comparing experiments in discounted problems

Discounting the Past

Long-Run Impulse Control with Generalized Discounting

(Im)patience by proxy: Making intertemporal decisions for others

Discounting and Impatience

Irreversible investment under weighted discounting: effects of decreasing impatience

Joint description of weak radiative and nonleptonic hyperon decays in broken SU(3)

You Can't Always Get What You Want : Games of Ordered Preference

Preference from Priorities: Dynamic Logic

Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.

Many-player games of optimal consumption and investment under relative performance criteria

Constrained dictatorial rules are subject to variable-population paradoxes

The effect of childhood socioeconomic status on patience