Abstract:Social influence is the process by which individuals adapt their opinion, revise their beliefs, or change their behavior as a result of social interactions with other people. In our strongly interconnected society, social influence plays a prominent role in many self-organized phenomena such as herding in cultural markets, the spread of ideas and innovations, and the amplification of fears during epidemics. Yet, the mechanisms of opinion formation remain poorly understood, and existing physics-based models lack systematic empirical validation. Here, we report two controlled experiments showing how participants answering factual questions revise their initial judgments after being exposed to the opinion and confidence level of others. Based on the observation of 59 experimental subjects exposed to peer-opinion for 15 different items, we draw an influence map that describes the strength of peer influence during interactions. A simple process model derived from our observations demonstrates how opinions in a group of interacting people can converge or split over repeated interactions. In particular, we identify two major attractors of opinion: (i) the expert effect, induced by the presence of a highly confident individual in the group, and (ii) the majority effect, caused by the presence of a critical mass of laypeople sharing similar opinions. Additional simulations reveal the existence of a tipping point at which one attractor will dominate over the other, driving collective opinion in a given direction. These findings have implications for understanding the mechanisms of public opinion formation and managing conflicting situations in which self-confident and better informed minorities challenge the views of a large uninformed majority.

Communication Reliably Improves Individual But Not Group Accuracy

Network Structures of Collective Intelligence: The Contingent Benefits of Group Discussion

Influencing Factors and Explanations of "Saying-is-Believing" Effect

The kind of group you want to belong to: Effects of group structure on group accuracy

How wise is the crowd: Can we infer people are accurate and competent merely because they agree with each other?

What to tell? Wise communication and wise crowd

Correlated Information Reduces Accuracy of Pioneering Decision-Makers

Communication Speeds Up but Impairs the Consensus Decision in a Dyadic Colour Estimation Task

How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect

Intergroup Competition Mitigates Effects of Reward Structure on Preference-Consistency Bias and Group Decision Failure

Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds

The Influence Of Epistemic Motivation On Shared Mental Model In Group Decision Making

Thinking more or thinking differently? Using drift-diffusion modeling to illuminate why accuracy prompts decrease misinformation sharing

Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation

Agents seeking long-term access to the wisdom of the crowd reduce immediate decision-making accuracy

Studying speed-accuracy trade-offs in best-of-n collective decision-making through heterogeneous mean-field modeling

Wisdom of the Confident: Using Social Interactions to Eliminate the Bias in Wisdom of the Crowds

Stuck in the Wisdom of Crowds: Information, Knowledge, and Heuristics

Social Influence Undermines the Wisdom of the Crowd in Sequential Decision Making

Social Opinion Formation and Decision Making Under Communication Trends