Harnessing LLMs for Automated Video Content Analysis: An Exploratory Workflow of Short Videos on Depression

Jiaying Lizzy Liu,Yunlong Wang,Yao Lyu,Yiheng Su,Shuo Niu,Xuhai Orson Xu,Yan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3678884.3681850
2024-07-30
Abstract:Despite the growing interest in leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for content analysis, current studies have primarily focused on text-based content. In the present work, we explored the potential of LLMs in assisting video content analysis by conducting a case study that followed a new workflow of LLM-assisted multimodal content analysis. The workflow encompasses codebook design, prompt engineering, LLM processing, and human evaluation. We strategically crafted annotation prompts to get LLM Annotations in structured form and explanation prompts to generate LLM Explanations for a better understanding of LLM reasoning and transparency. To test LLM's video annotation capabilities, we analyzed 203 keyframes extracted from 25 YouTube short videos about depression. We compared the LLM Annotations with those of two human coders and found that LLM has higher accuracy in object and activity Annotations than emotion and genre Annotations. Moreover, we identified the potential and limitations of LLM's capabilities in annotating videos. Based on the findings, we explore opportunities and challenges for future research and improvements to the workflow. We also discuss ethical concerns surrounding future studies based on LLM-assisted video analysis.
Human-Computer Interaction,Artificial Intelligence,Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to utilize the capabilities of large - language models (LLMs) in video content analysis, especially to conduct automated multi - modal content analysis on depression - related content in short videos. Current research mainly focuses on text content, while this paper explores the potential of LLMs in video content analysis and achieves this goal through a four - step workflow of designing codebooks, prompt engineering, LLM processing, and manual evaluation. Specifically, the researchers tested the capabilities of LLMs in video annotation by analyzing 203 key frames extracted from YouTube and compared them with the annotations of two human coders. The study found that LLMs have high accuracy in object and activity annotations, but perform poorly in emotion and type annotations. In addition, the paper also discusses opportunities and challenges for future research, including how to better integrate human participation in the workflow and how to improve LLMs to understand the dynamic context of videos.