The experience of humans' and robots' mutual (im)politeness in enacted service scenarios: An empirical study

Victor Kaptelinin,Suna Bensch,Thomas Hellström,Patrik Björnfot,Shikhar Kumar

2024-06-25

Abstract:The paper reports an empirical study of the effect of human treatment of a robot on the social perception of the robot's behavior. The study employed an enacted interaction between an anthropomorphic "waiter" robot and two customers. The robot and one of the customers (acted out by a researcher) were following four different interaction scripts, representing all combinations of mutual politeness and impoliteness of the robot and the customer. The participants (N=24, within-subject design) were assigned the role of an "included observer", that is, a fellow customer who was present in the situation without being actively involved in the interactions. The participants assessed how they experienced the interaction scenarios by providing Likert scale scores and free-text responses. The results indicate that while impolite robots' behavior was generally assessed negatively, it was commonly perceived as more justifiable and fairer if the robot was treated impolitely by the human. Politeness reciprocity expectations in the context of the social perception of robots are discussed.

Robotics,Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how, in service scenarios, humans' polite or impolite behaviors towards robots affect bystanders' social perception of robot behaviors. Specifically, the research focuses on how robots should respond when they are treated politely or impolite by humans, and how such responses are perceived by the observing humans. The research explores the role of politeness reciprocity in human - robot interaction by designing four different interaction scripts that cover all possible combinations of politeness and impoliteness between robots and humans. The experiment used an anthropomorphic "waiter" robot and two customers (one of whom was played by a researcher), and the participants served as "participant - observers", that is, another customer in the same situation but not directly involved in the interaction. Participants were required to evaluate their feelings about different interaction scenarios, providing Likert scale ratings and free - text responses. The research results show that although impolite robot behaviors are generally negatively evaluated, if the robot has been previously treated impolitely by a human, its behavior is more often considered reasonable and fair. The paper also discusses the view of the expectation of politeness reciprocity in the context of robot social perception.