Abstract:The classical stability margin analysis based on the linearized model is widely used in practice even in nonlinear systems. Although linear analysis techniques are relatively standard and have simple implementation structures, they are prone to misbehavior and failure when the system is performing an off-nominal operation. To avoid the drawbacks and exploit the advantages of linear analysis methods and frequency-domain stability margin analysis while tackling system nonlinearity, a state-compensation-linearization-based stability margin analysis method is studied in the paper. Based on the state-compensation-linearization-based stabilizing control, the definition and measurement of the stability margin are given. The l2 gain margin and l2 time-delay margin for the closed-loop nonlinear system with state-compensation-linearization-based stabilizing control are defined and derived approximatively by the small-gain theorem in theory. The stability margin measurement can be carried out by the frequency-sweep method in practice. The proposed method is a data-driven method for obtaining the stability margin of nonlinear systems, which is practical and can be applied to practical systems directly. Finally, three numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to address the complexity and difficulty in the stability margin analysis of nonlinear systems. Specifically, the paper proposes a stability margin analysis method based on state compensation linearization to overcome the limitations of traditional linear analysis methods when dealing with nonlinear systems.
#### Background and Motivation
1. **Stability Margin Analysis of Linear Systems**:
- Classical stability margin analysis methods (such as gain margin and phase margin) are already very mature and widely used in linear systems.
- However, these methods have limitations when applied to nonlinear systems because frequency domain analysis and synthesis cannot be directly applied to nonlinear systems.
2. **Challenges of Nonlinear Systems**:
- Stability margin analysis of nonlinear systems is more complex and difficult.
- Traditional linear control techniques are usually used at discrete operating points or nominal trajectories, but this approach may fail in practical operations, especially in cases of strong nonlinearity.
- Experimental methods (such as Monte Carlo simulations) are effective but time-consuming and costly, and may not accurately estimate the worst-case stability margin.
#### Solutions
1. **Stability Control Based on State Compensation Linearization**:
- By introducing the state compensation linearization method, the uncertainties of the nonlinear system are concentrated in the main system and compensated in the subsystems.
- This method makes the stability margin analysis of nonlinear systems easier.
2. **Frequency Domain Stability Margin Analysis**:
- Using the small gain theorem, the L2 gain margin and L2 delay margin of the closed-loop nonlinear system are defined and derived.
- A data-driven method based on frequency sweep experiments is proposed to measure the stability margin, which is more practical and can be directly applied to actual systems.
3. **Main Contributions**:
- Defined new stability margins and proposed a measurement method that can be implemented through practical experiments (such as frequency sweep experiments).
- Extended the frequency domain stability margin analysis method to nonlinear systems.
- Proposed a complete robustness and stability design and analysis process for nonlinear systems, which is practical and operable.
### Summary
By introducing the state compensation linearization method, the paper addresses the complexity and difficulty in the stability margin analysis of nonlinear systems. It proposes a data-driven frequency sweep experiment method to measure the stability margin, thus providing new tools and methods for the control design of nonlinear systems.