Absence of a bulk charge density wave signature in x-ray measurements of UTe$_2$

Caitlin S. Kengle,Dipanjan Chaudhuri,Xuefei Guo,Thomas A. Johnson,Simon Bettler,Wolfgang Simeth,Matthew J. Krogstad,Zahir Islam,Sheng Ran,Shanta R. Saha,Johnpierre Paglione,Nicholas P. Butch,Eduardo Fradkin,Vidya Madhavan,Peter Abbamonte
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.145101
2024-10-15
Abstract:The long-sought pair density wave (PDW) is an exotic phase of matter in which charge density wave (CDW) order is intertwined with the amplitude or phase of coexisting, superconducting order \cite{Berg2009,Berg2009b}. Originally predicted to exist in copper-oxides, circumstantial evidence for PDW order now exists in a variety of materials. Recently, scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) studies have reported evidence for a three-component charge density wave (CDW) at the surface of the heavy-fermion superconductor, UTe$_2$, persisting below its superconducting transition temperature. Here, we use hard x-ray diffraction measurements on crystals of UTe$_2$ at $T = 1.9$ K and $12$ K to search for a bulk signature of this CDW. Using STM measurements as a constraint, we calculate the expected locations of CDW superlattice peaks, and sweep a large volume of reciprocal space in search of a signature. We failed to find any evidence for a CDW near any of the expected superlattice positions in many Brillouin zones. We estimate an upper bound on the CDW lattice distortion of $u_{max} \lesssim 4 \times 10^{-3} \mathrmÅ$. Our results suggest that the CDW observed in STM is either purely electronic, somehow lacking a signature in the structural lattice, or is restricted to the material surface.
Strongly Correlated Electrons
What problem does this paper attempt to address?