A catalog of observed geo-effective CME/ICME characteristics
Ronish Mugatwala,Simone Chierichini,Gregoire Francisco,Gianluca Napoletano,Raffaello Foldes,Luca Giovannelli,Giancarlo De Gasperis,Enrico Camporeale,Robertus Erdélyi,Dario Del Moro,Robertus Erdelyi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2024004
IF: 3.3
2024-02-20
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
Abstract:One of the goals of Space Weather studies is to achieve a better understanding of impulsive phenomena, such as Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), in order to improve our ability to forecast them and mitigate the risk to our technologically driven society. The essential part of achieving this goal is to assess the performance of forecasting models. To this end, the quality and availability of suitable data are of paramount importance. In this work, we have merged already publicly available data of CMEs from both in-situ and remote instrumentation in order to build a database of CME properties. To evaluate the accuracy of such a database and confirm the relationship between in-situ and remote observations, we have employed the drag-based model (DBM) due to its simplicity and inexpensive cost of computational resources. In this study, we have also explored the parameter space for the drag parameter and solar wind speed using a Monte Carlo approach to evaluate how well the DBM determines the propagation of CMEs for the events in the dataset. The geoeffective CMEs selected as a result of this work are compliant with the hypothesis of DBM (isolated CME, constant solar wind speed) and also yield further insight into CME features like arrival time, arrival speed, lift-off time, etc. The preliminary analysis shows that almost 50 % of CME events in the dataset follow DBM approximation while propagating in the heliosphere. Furthermore, the dataset also provides statistical metrics for the DBM model parameters. Also, the probability distribution function for the free parameters of DBM has been derived through a Monte Carlo-like inversion procedure. Probability functions obtained from this work are comparable to distributions employed in previous works. The analysis showed that there exist two different most probable values of solar wind speed for DBM input based on slow (w slow ≈ 385.84 km/s) and fast (w f ast ≈ 546.99 km/s) solar wind type. While the most probable value for drag parameter (γ ≈ 0.687×10−7 km−1 ) input is somewhat higher compared to previous study. Using a data-driven approach, this procedure allows us to present a homogeneous, reliable, and robust dataset for the investigation of CME propagation. On the other hand, possible CME events are identified where DBM prediction is not valid due to model limitations and higher uncertainties in the input parameters, these events require more thorough investigation.
astronomy & astrophysics,geochemistry & geophysics,meteorology & atmospheric sciences