Implant-to-Wearable Communication through the Human Body: Exploring the Effects of Encapsulated Capacitive and Galvanic Transmitters

Anyu Jiang,Cassandra Acebal,Brook Heyd,Trustin White,Gurleen Kainth,Arunashish Datta,Shreyas Sen,Adam Khalifa,Baibhab Chatterjee

2024-06-19

Abstract:Data transfer using human-body communication (HBC) represents an actively explored alternative solution to address the challenges related to energy-efficiency, tissue absorption, and security of conventional wireless. Although the use of HBC for wearable-to-wearable communication has been well-explored, different configurations for the transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) for implant-to-wearable HBC needs further studies. This paper substantiates the hypothesis that a fully implanted galvanic Tx is more efficient than a capacitive Tx for interaction with a wearable Rx. Given the practical limitations of implanting an ideal capacitive device, we choose a galvanic device with one electrode encapsulated to model the capacitive scenario. We analyze the lumped circuit model for in-body to out-of-body communication, and perform Circuit-based as well as Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations to explore how the encapsulation thickness affects the received signal levels. We demonstrate in-vivo experimental results on live Sprague Dawley rats to validate the hypothesis, and show that compared to the galvanic Tx, the channel loss will be $\approx$ 20 dB higher with each additional mm thickness of capacitive encapsulation, eventually going below the noise floor for ideal capacitive Tx.

Tissues and Organs

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to address the challenges faced when implantable devices and wearable devices communicate through human body communication (HBC). Specifically, the authors studied the impact of different types of transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) configurations on HBC performance, especially comparing the performance of capacitive and galvanic transmitters in implant - to - wearable communication.

#### Main problems:
1. **Energy efficiency**: Traditional wireless communication technologies (such as Bluetooth, Wi - Fi) have problems such as large energy losses in high - frequency signal transmissions, the need for frequent battery replacement, or reliance on better energy - harvesting technologies.
2. **Tissue absorption**: High - frequency signals are highly absorbed in the human body, resulting in severe signal attenuation.
3. **Security**: Traditional wireless communication is vulnerable to electromagnetic leakage and hacker attacks, while HBC uses the conductive properties of the human body for low - power, secure data transmission.
4. **Signal path integrity**: For fully implanted devices, capacitive transmitters lack a direct ground loop, which can lead to an incomplete signal path, making it almost impossible for the receiving end to receive a valid signal.

#### Research hypotheses:
The authors hypothesized that a fully implanted galvanic transmitter (Galvanic Tx) interacts more efficiently with a wearable receiver (Wearable Rx) than a capacitive transmitter (Capacitive Tx). To test this hypothesis, they carried out circuit modeling, finite - element - method (FEM) simulations, and in - vivo experiments.

#### Key findings:
- **Effect of encapsulation thickness**: As the encapsulation thickness of the capacitive transmitter increases, each additional 1 - millimeter increase in encapsulation thickness results in an approximately 20 - dB increase in channel loss, and eventually the signal will drop below the noise level.
- **In - vivo experiment verification**: In - vivo experiments on Sprague Dawley rats verified the results of theoretical analysis and simulation, demonstrating the superiority of the galvanic transmitter in implant - to - wearable communication.

In conclusion, through systematic research, this paper has confirmed that in communication between implantable and wearable devices, the galvanic transmitter is more efficient and reliable than the capacitive transmitter. This provides important guidance for the design of future implantable medical devices.