Advancing Retail Data Science: Comprehensive Evaluation of Synthetic Data

Yu Xia,Chi-Hua Wang,Joshua Mabry,Guang Cheng
2024-06-19
Abstract:The evaluation of synthetic data generation is crucial, especially in the retail sector where data accuracy is paramount. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for assessing synthetic retail data, focusing on fidelity, utility, and privacy. Our approach differentiates between continuous and discrete data attributes, providing precise evaluation criteria. Fidelity is measured through stability and generalizability. Stability ensures synthetic data accurately replicates known data distributions, while generalizability confirms its robustness in novel scenarios. Utility is demonstrated through the synthetic data's effectiveness in critical retail tasks such as demand forecasting and dynamic pricing, proving its value in predictive analytics and strategic planning. Privacy is safeguarded using Differential Privacy, ensuring synthetic data maintains a perfect balance between resembling training and holdout datasets without compromising security. Our findings validate that this framework provides reliable and scalable evaluation for synthetic retail data. It ensures high fidelity, utility, and privacy, making it an essential tool for advancing retail data science. This framework meets the evolving needs of the retail industry with precision and confidence, paving the way for future advancements in synthetic data methodologies.
Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve This paper aims to address the evaluation of synthetic data generation in retail data science. Specifically, it proposes a comprehensive framework for evaluating synthetic retail data across three key dimensions: Fidelity, Utility, and Privacy. Below are the specific objectives for each dimension: 1. **Fidelity**: - **Stability**: Ensure that synthetic data can accurately replicate known data distributions, reflecting the model's robustness in familiar scenarios. - **Generalizability**: Assess the performance of synthetic data in new contexts, ensuring that the generated data can effectively extend beyond the training parameters. This is particularly important in the rapidly changing retail market. 2. **Utility**: - Measure the effectiveness of synthetic data in key retail tasks, such as demand forecasting and dynamic pricing. These tasks are crucial for operational efficiency and profitability. The evaluation framework demonstrates the value of synthetic data in predictive analytics and strategic planning. 3. **Privacy**: - Use techniques like Differential Privacy to ensure that synthetic data maintains similarity to the training and holdout datasets without leaking sensitive information. This is especially important in the retail industry, where customer data privacy is a major concern. ### Background and Motivation In the retail industry, data privacy and availability are major obstacles. Synthetic data, as artificially generated data, can effectively address these issues. It can simulate real data without exposing sensitive customer information while maintaining the statistical properties and patterns of actual data. This allows retailers to conduct robust analyses and model training without violating privacy regulations. Additionally, obtaining large amounts of high-quality data can be challenging, especially when dealing with new products or services where historical data may be scarce or non-existent. Public datasets are often much smaller than standard industry datasets and frequently exhibit biases, lacking many key fields. Synthetic data generation can overcome these issues by creating rich and diverse datasets that reflect potential future scenarios or underrepresented cases, which is crucial for training machine learning models. ### Objectives and Contributions Developing a robust synthetic data evaluation framework is essential to ensure the data's validity and utility. Without rigorous evaluation, synthetic data may fail to accurately reflect real-world complexities, leading to misleading insights and poor decision-making. Therefore, the paper proposes a standardized evaluation framework to comprehensively assess retail synthetic datasets from the perspectives of Fidelity, Utility, and Privacy. This framework not only ensures that synthetic data is statistically similar to real data but also ensures its usefulness in practical retail applications. This process helps identify any discrepancies and areas where synthetic data may fall short, guiding improvements in data generation methods. Ultimately, a robust evaluation framework builds trust in synthetic data, making it a reliable resource for retailers. In this way, the paper ensures a safe and scalable approach to generating high-quality synthetic data while maintaining privacy compliance. ### Evaluation Framework 1. **Data Splitting**: - Randomly split the available records into three distinct datasets: Training Dataset (T), Holdout Dataset (H), and Evaluation Dataset (E). The Evaluation Dataset is used solely for assessing model utility. The Training Dataset is used to train the synthesizer, while the Holdout Dataset remains unchanged during synthetic data generation. By exposing only the Training Dataset to the synthesizer, generate a synthetic dataset of the same size as the Training Dataset. The Holdout Dataset serves as a benchmark to evaluate the synthesizer's generalizability on unseen data. 2. **Fidelity Evaluation**: - **Marginal Distribution Similarity**: Visualize the distribution of numerical features by plotting histograms, density plots, and cumulative distribution functions. Calculate the Wasserstein distance to measure distribution similarity. - **Joint Distribution Similarity**: Calculate Pearson correlation matrices, Theil's U matrices, and correlation ratio matrices to assess interactions and dependencies between features. Compute the L2 distance to verify whether the synthesizer understands feature interactions and dependencies. 3. **Utility Evaluation**: