Abstract:Over a quarter of total assets under management is now invested in socially responsible companies. This marks an astounding repudiation of Wall Street’s get-rich-fast mentality, as well as a direct challenge to corporate law’s reigning mantra of profit maximization above all. Yet, this new direction has gained followers not only among progressive academics, but also among conservative corporate law scions and financial industry CEOs. To understand this phenomenon and its implications for corporate law, we argue that it offers companies a superior tool in mitigating risk. We compare sustainability to compliance, corporate law’s only risk mitigation device, and argue that its informality and broad scope, coupled with direct engagement with stakeholders, can deliver significant benefits in preventing or weathering a corporate collapse. These benefits, though important to all shareholders, are particularly valuable for large asset managers, who have come to dominate public companies’ shareholding structure in the last decade. Because of their contractual commitments to their clients, asset managers like Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard, cannot easily diversify their holdings from such risks. They are forced to continue holding stocks after severe drops in price until they are thrown out of an index, to invest in industries in the throes of significant crisis, and to suffer externalities imposed to other companies during a corporate collapse. To address these pitfalls, asset managers have struck an unexpected alliance with sustainability heads and other like-minded officers, often below the C-suite, to engineer change in the companies they invest. They have backed these officers with public statements and through their engagement efforts. Moreover, they have supported governance reforms that enhance sustainability’s visibility within the company. For example, they demanded that board committees specifically undertake the task of overseeing sustainability and fought for changing board composition to include directors with competence in sustainability. Delaware courts, we argue, should recognize sustainability’s benefits in mitigating risk. By failing to establish an appropriate sustainability function, directors and managers are unnecessarily exposing their shareholders to increased risk. If their failure is due to bad faith, they should be found in violation of their duty of loyalty to shareholders. To satisfy the good faith requirement, boards should ensure that their company has a well-running ESG function with proper board oversight, that their ESG function targets a reasonable set of priorities, and that it reaches out to stakeholders to inform its initiatives and proposals. This governance reform, we conclude, is essential to allow sustainability to reach its full potential.

Essays on Responsible and Sustainable Finance

The Influence of ESG on Firm Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China

Fiduciary Duty in the Municipal Bonds Market

Three Essays on Corporate Debt, Capital Structure and Managerial Entrenchment

Sustainability in Corporate Law

Accounting for Society: Examining the Interplay between Financial Reporting and Social Responsibility

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Factors and Municipal Bond Yields

Corporate Financial Management, Risk Assessment, and Investment Strategies: Analyzing Their Effects on Business Sustainability

ALIGNING PROFIT WITH PLANET: STRATEGIES AND IMPLICATIONS OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE IN THE MODERN ECONOMY

Challenges and Trends in Sustainable Corporate Finance: A Bibliometric Systematic Review

Local Government Debt and Its Impact on Corporate Underinvestment and ESG Performance: Empirical Evidence from China

How fiduciary duty law incentivises investors to manage sustainability risks

From ratings to resilience: The role and implications of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance in corporate solvency

Understanding the Role of Finance in Sustainable Development: A Qualitative Study on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Practices

Sustainable Investment Practices: Assessing the Influence of ESG Factors on Financial Performance

Fiduciary duty for directors and managers in the light of anti-ESG sentiment: an analysis of Delaware Law

The effect of environmental sustainability on credit risk

Corporate environmental performance and financing decisions

Fostering sustainability: integrating social responsibility, green finance, and corporate performance

Local public corruption and corporate debt concentration: evidence from US firms

Sustainable Finance: A Journey Toward ESG and Climate Risk