Feasibility of Non-Line-of-Sight Integrated Sensing and Communication at mmWave

Paolo Tosi,Marcus Henninger,Lucas Giroto de Oliveira,Silvio Mandelli

2024-07-31

Abstract:One rarely addressed direction in the context of Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) is non-line-of-sight (NLOS) sensing, with the potential to enable use cases like intrusion detection and to increase the value that wireless networks can bring. However, ISAC networks impose challenges for sensing due to their communication-oriented design. For instance, time division duplex transmission creates spectral holes in time, resulting in spectral replicas in the radar image. To counteract this, we evaluate different channel state information processing strategies and discuss their tradeoffs. We further propose an ensemble of techniques to detect targets in NLOS conditions. Our approaches are validated with experiments using a millimeter wave ISAC proof of concept in a factory-like environment. The results show that target detection in NLOS is generally possible with ISAC.

Signal Processing

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: the feasibility of achieving target detection through millimeter - wave (mmWave) integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems under non - line - of - sight (NLOS) conditions. Specifically, the paper explores how to use ISAC technology for NLOS sensing in wireless communication networks to support application scenarios such as intrusion detection.

### Problem Background

Traditional ISAC systems mainly focus on target detection under line - of - sight (LOS) conditions. However, in the actual environment, radio waves may reach the target indirectly through the reflection of objects such as walls and buildings, forming NLOS conditions. In this case, traditional fixed - camera or LiDAR systems cannot work effectively, while NLOS sensing can provide the ability of "behind - the - corner" detection, which is very useful for intrusion detection in urban security movement and monitoring systems.

### Main Challenges

1. **Communication Design Limitations**: Existing ISAC systems are mainly designed for communication, so they face some challenges when performing sensing. For example, time - division duplex (TDD) transmission will create spectral holes in time, resulting in spectral replicas in the radar image, thus affecting the signal quality.
2. **Low Signal - to - Noise Ratio (SNR)**: Under NLOS conditions, since the signal undergoes multiple reflections, the power of the reflected signal at the receiving end is usually low, which imposes higher requirements for detecting targets.

### Solutions

To overcome these challenges, the paper proposes and evaluates several channel state information (CSI) processing strategies:

1. **CSI Extraction**: Remove spectral replicas by avoiding spectral holes in TDD mode, thereby improving SNR.
2. **Multi - frame Processing**: Increase the processing gain by splicing the data of multiple frames together, thereby improving the velocity resolution and SNR.
3. **CFAR - based Detection Algorithm**: Use a constant false - alarm rate (CFAR) detector combined with a range - adjusted exponential threshold to distinguish between noise and target echoes.
4. **Clutter Removal**: Use the subspace method to remove clutter in the environment to improve detection accuracy.

### Experimental Verification

The paper verifies the effectiveness of the above methods through experiments. The experiments were carried out in a factory - like environment using a millimeter - wave ISAC prototype system. The results show that under NLOS conditions, target detection is feasible and can be used for application scenarios such as intrusion detection.

### Conclusion

This research demonstrates the feasibility of target detection through millimeter - wave ISAC systems under NLOS conditions, providing new application prospects for future 6G networks. Future work will further optimize the detection algorithms and verify their performance in more scenarios.

### Formula Summary

- **Unambiguous Velocity**:
\[
v_{\text{unamb}}=\frac{c_0}{2f_cT_s}
\]
- **Unambiguous Distance**:
\[
d_{\text{unamb}}=\frac{c_0}{2\Delta f}
\]
- **Velocity Resolution**:
\[
v_{\text{res}}=\frac{c_0}{2MT_sf_c}
\]
- **Distance Resolution**:
\[
d_{\text{res}}=\frac{c_0}{2N\Delta f}
\]
- **Signal - to - Noise Ratio (SNR)**:
\[
\text{SNR}=\frac{\max(S(n,m))}{\sigma_N^2}
\]
- **CFAR Threshold**:
\[
\eta_{\text{CFAR}} = -\sigma_N^2\ln\left(1-(1 - p_{\text{FA}})^{\frac{1}{NM}}\right)
\]
- **Range - adjusted Exponential Threshold**:
\[
\eta_{\text{exp}}=\eta_{\text{CFAR}}+\frac{\alpha}{d^2}
\]

where \(c_0\) is the speed of light, \(f_c\) is the carrier frequency, \(T_s\) is the OFDM symbol time, \(\Delta f\) is the frequency spacing, \(M\) and \(N\) are the number of sub - carriers in the frequency and time domains respectively, \(S(n,m)\) is the received signal matrix, \(\sigma_N^2\) is the noise variance, \(p_{\text{FA}}\) is the false - alarm probability, and \(\alpha\) is a constant related to the range.