Abstract:We consider two symmetry metrics to detect partisan gerrymandering: the Mean-Median Difference (MM) and Partisan Bias (PB). To lay the groundwork for our main results, we first assert that the foundation of a partisan gerrymander is to draw a map so that the preferred party wins an extreme number of seats, and that both the Mean-Median Difference and Partisan Bias have been used to detect partisan gerrymandering.
We then provide both a theoretical and empirical analysis of the Mean-Median Difference and Partisan Bias. In our theoretical analysis, we consider vote-share, seat-share pairs (V,S) for which one can construct election data having vote share V and seat share S, and turnout is equal in each district. We calculate the range of values that MM and PB can achieve on that constructed election data. In the process, we find the range of vote-share, seat share pairs (V,S) for which there is constructed election data with vote share V , seat share S, and MM = 0, and see that the corresponding range for PB is the same set of (V,S) pairs. We show how the set of such (V,S) pairs allowing for MM = 0 (and PB = 0) changes when turnout in each district is allowed to be different.
By observing the results of this theoretical analysis, we give examples of how these two metrics are unable to detect when a map has an extreme number of districts won. Because these examples are constructed, we follow this with our empirical study, in which we show on 18 different U.S. maps that these two metrics are unable to detect when a map has an extreme number of districts won.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to explore the effectiveness and limitations of two symmetry indicators for detecting partisan gerrymandering - Mean - Median Difference (MM) and Partisan Bias (PB). Specifically, through theoretical analysis and empirical research, the paper reveals the deficiencies of these indicators in detecting the number of extreme district victories.
#### Main problems:
1. **Ability to detect the number of extreme district victories**:
- The paper points out that the key to determining whether a district division constitutes partisan gerrymandering lies in whether the number of districts won by one side is abnormally large.
- However, the paper finds that the theoretical value ranges of the two indicators MM and PB are very wide and cannot effectively detect such extreme situations.
- Empirical research shows that in practical applications, these indicators are also unable to effectively detect the number of extreme district victories.
2. **Limitations of existing tools**:
- Although MM and PB have been widely used in software, court cases, and expert testimony, their effectiveness is doubtful.
- The paper recommends no longer using MM and PB as tools for detecting partisan gerrymandering, especially not as proxy indicators for "the number of extreme district victories".
#### Theoretical and empirical analysis:
- **Theoretical analysis**: By constructing election data, the paper calculates the value ranges of MM and PB under different voter turnout and seat allocation situations and finds that these ranges are too wide to provide meaningful detection results.
- **Empirical research**: Through the actual data analysis of 18 US districts, the paper further verifies the ineffectiveness of MM and PB in such detections.
#### Conclusion:
The paper believes that the existing MM and PB indicators have significant defects in detecting partisan gerrymandering, especially in identifying the number of extreme district victories. Therefore, the author recommends stopping using these indicators and seeking more effective alternative methods to evaluate the fairness of district division.
#### Formula presentation:
- **Mean - Median Difference (Mean - Median Difference, MM)**:
\[
\text{MM} = \text{median}\{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_n\} - \text{mean}\{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_n\}
\]
- **Partisan Bias (Partisan Bias, PB)**:
\[
\text{PB} = \frac{1}{2} \left( \text{Proportion of } V_i > V - \text{Proportion of } V_i < V \right)
\]
where \( V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_n \) are the vote - getting rates in each district, and \( V \) is the average vote - getting rate.