Abstract:We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs) inspired by human meta-reasoning. Traditional in-context learning-based reasoning techniques, such as Tree-of-Thoughts, show promise but lack consistent state-of-the-art performance across diverse tasks due to their specialized nature. MRP addresses this limitation by guiding LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task, optimizing both performance and computational efficiency. With MRP, LLM reasoning operates in two phases. Initially, the LLM identifies the most appropriate reasoning method using task input cues and objective descriptions of available methods. Subsequently, it applies the chosen method to complete the task. This dynamic strategy mirrors human meta-reasoning, allowing the model to excel in a wide range of problem domains. We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks. The results demonstrate that MRP achieves or approaches state-of-the-art performance across diverse tasks. MRP represents a significant advancement in enabling LLMs to identify cognitive challenges across problems and leverage benefits across different reasoning approaches, enhancing their ability to handle diverse and complex problem domains efficiently. Every LLM deserves a Meta-Reasoning Prompting to unlock its full potential and ensure adaptability in an ever-evolving landscape of challenges and applications.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve The paper attempts to address the issue of large language models (LLMs) lacking reasoning capabilities when handling diverse and complex tasks. Although existing reasoning techniques such as "Tree-of-Thoughts" perform well on certain tasks, they do not consistently perform well across different tasks because these methods are often designed for specific tasks. To overcome this limitation, the paper proposes Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), which guides LLMs to dynamically select and apply the most suitable reasoning method for a specific task, thereby optimizing their performance and computational efficiency. ### Specific Problems 1. **Limitations of Existing Reasoning Methods**: - Existing reasoning techniques like Chain-of-Thoughts and Tree-of-Thoughts perform well on some tasks but lack consistent top-level performance across diverse tasks. - These methods are often optimized for specific tasks, leading to poor performance on other tasks. 2. **Need for More Flexible Reasoning Methods**: - To handle diverse and complex tasks in the real world, a more adaptive and flexible reasoning method is needed. - Humans can adjust and choose different reasoning strategies based on specific situations when facing different tasks, a meta-reasoning capability that current LLMs lack. 3. **Improving the Generality and Adaptability of LLMs**: - By introducing MRP, LLMs can dynamically select the most appropriate reasoning method for different tasks, thereby improving their performance across various problem domains. - MRP aims to enhance the generality and adaptability of LLMs, enabling them to handle complex and diverse problems more effectively. ### Solution The Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP) method proposed in the paper is implemented through the following steps: 1. **Task Input Analysis**: - The LLM first evaluates the effectiveness of each reasoning method based on the task input and the description of available reasoning methods. - By combining the task input and the description of reasoning methods, a score is generated to select the most appropriate reasoning method. 2. **Dynamic Selection of Reasoning Methods**: - The reasoning method with the highest score is selected and applied to complete the task. - This dynamic selection strategy is similar to the human meta-reasoning process, allowing the model to choose the most effective strategy for different tasks. 3. **Experimental Validation**: - The effectiveness of MRP is validated through multiple widely-used benchmarks. - Experimental results show that MRP achieves near or top-level performance across various tasks, especially those requiring multiple reasoning strategies. ### Conclusion MRP significantly improves the performance of LLMs in handling diverse and complex tasks by dynamically selecting and applying the most appropriate reasoning method. This approach not only performs well across multiple benchmarks but is also particularly suitable for tasks requiring multiple reasoning strategies. Future research can further explore the application of MRP in training data to enhance the meta-cognitive and general reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models

Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Large Language Models for Deductive Reasoning.

Meta-Reasoning: Semantics-Symbol Deconstruction for Large Language Models

Metacognitive Prompting Improves Understanding in Large Language Models

Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey

Rational Metareasoning for Large Language Models

MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs

Logic-of-Thought: Injecting Logic into Contexts for Full Reasoning in Large Language Models

Unlocking Structured Thinking in Language Models with Cognitive Prompting

MR-GSM8K: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Model Evaluation

MAF: Multi-Aspect Feedback for Improving Reasoning in Large Language Models

Towards Generalist Prompting for Large Language Models by Mental Models

Logic Contrastive Reasoning with Lightweight Large Language Model for Math Word Problems

Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models

Self-Renewal Prompt Optimizing with Implicit Reasoning

Thought Propagation: An Analogical Approach to Complex Reasoning with Large Language Models

The Role of Deductive and Inductive Reasoning in Large Language Models

Reason-and-Execute Prompting: Enhancing Multi-Modal Large Language Models for Solving Geometry Questions

Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision

Let's Be Self-generated via Step by Step: A Curriculum Learning Approach to Automated Reasoning with Large Language Models