Fine-Tuning or Fine-Failing? Debunking Performance Myths in Large Language Models

Scott Barnett,Zac Brannelly,Stefanus Kurniawan,Sheng Wong

2024-06-30

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have the unique capability to understand and generate human-like text from input queries. When fine-tuned, these models show enhanced performance on domain-specific queries. OpenAI highlights the process of fine-tuning, stating: "To fine-tune a model, you are required to provide at least 10 examples. We typically see clear improvements from fine-tuning on 50 to 100 training examples, but the right number varies greatly based on the exact use case." This study extends this concept to the integration of LLMs within Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines, which aim to improve accuracy and relevance by leveraging external corpus data for information retrieval. However, RAG's promise of delivering optimal responses often falls short in complex query scenarios. This study aims to specifically examine the effects of fine-tuning LLMs on their ability to extract and integrate contextual data to enhance the performance of RAG systems across multiple domains. We evaluate the impact of fine-tuning on the LLMs' capacity for data extraction and contextual understanding by comparing the accuracy and completeness of fine-tuned models against baseline performances across datasets from multiple domains. Our findings indicate that fine-tuning resulted in a decline in performance compared to the baseline models, contrary to the improvements observed in standalone LLM applications as suggested by OpenAI. This study highlights the need for vigorous investigation and validation of fine-tuned models for domain-specific tasks.

Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper mainly discusses the fine-tuning effect of large language models (LLMs) in the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system. The study found that although fine-tuning is generally believed to improve the performance of the model in specific domains, empirical research shows that fine-tuning LLMs in the RAG pipeline does not always improve their accuracy and completeness in question-answering tasks. In contrast to the observations of OpenAI, the fine-tuned models in the study performed worse on multiple domain datasets instead of improvement.

The paper examines the impact of fine-tuning on the ability of LLMs to extract and integrate contextual data in the RAG system by comparing the performance of fine-tuned models with baseline models on different datasets such as BioASQ, Natural Questions, and Qasper. The results show that fine-tuning sometimes leads to performance decline, especially when dealing with complex queries, which may be related to overfitting or improper handling of domain-specific knowledge by the model.

The study also emphasizes the need for rigorous validation of fine-tuned models to ensure their applicability in specific tasks. In addition, the paper points out that the size of the training dataset is not always positively correlated with the fine-tuning effect, as larger training datasets may sometimes result in performance degradation. These findings question the practice of relying on fine-tuning to improve the performance of LLMs in the RAG system and call for future research to more thoroughly explore the applicability conditions and best practices of fine-tuning.